QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 1, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 587-598 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.012096

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Flammang, B. E. Articles by Lauder, G. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Flammang, B. E. Articles by Lauder, G. V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Speed-dependent intrinsic caudal fin muscle recruitment during steady swimming in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus

Brooke E. Flammang^* and George V. Lauder

Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: bflammang{at}oeb.harvard.edu)

Accepted 3 December 2007

There are approximately 50 muscles that control tail fin shape in most teleost fishes, and although myotomal muscle function has been extensively studied, little work has been done on the intrinsic musculature that controls and shapes the tail. In this study we measured electrical activity in intrinsic tail musculature to determine if these muscles are active during steady rectilinear locomotion, and to compare intrinsic muscle recruitment patterns to previous data on myotomal muscle fibers. Five bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) were anaesthetized and electrode wires surgically placed into a total of 24 intrinsic caudal muscles, up to 13 at a time, and activity was correlated with synchronous recordings from myotomal fibers in the caudal peduncle. After recovery, fish swam steadily at speeds of 0.5, 1.2 and 2.0 L s^–1, while filmed from lateral, posterior and ventral views simultaneously at 250 frames s^–1. Comparison among speeds confirmed that muscle recruitment varies significantly with speed. At 0.5 L s^–1, the caudal fin was generally not used for propulsion, and swimming was accomplished primarily through body undulations. Intrinsic caudal muscle activity at this speed was intermittent and variable. At 1.2 and 2.0 L s^–1, the supracarinalis and infracarinalis muscles acted on the dorsal- and ventral-most fin rays, respectively, to expand the surface area of the caudal fin. The interradialis muscles adducted individual fin rays, dorsally to ventrally, following activation of the hypochordal longitudinalis. Contralateral muscle activity of interradialis muscles occurred as the caudal fin crossed the mean direction of travel and fin height was greatest, whereas ipsilateral activity of carinalis muscles occurred near points of maximum excursion of the fin, at speeds of 1.2 and 2.0 L s^–1, after fin height was lowest. Burst intensity increased with swimming speed, suggesting stiffening of the tail fin against imposed hydrodynamic loads. Activity patterns of intrinsic caudal muscles suggest that these most posterior muscles in fishes, located within the tail, are among the very first recruited as swimming speed increases, and that slow undulatory swimming is powered by muscle fibers located posteriorly in the caudal peduncle and tail.

Key words: fish, swimming, locomotion, kinematics, electromyography, muscle, caudal fin

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. E. Flammang and G. V. Lauder Caudal fin shape modulation and control during acceleration, braking and backing maneuvers in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2009; 212(2): 277 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]