spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 18, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 409-422 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.011213
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weng, X.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Beyenbach, K. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weng, X.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Beyenbach, K. W.

Gap junctions in Malpighian tubules of Aedes aegypti

Xing-He Weng1, Peter M. Piermarini1, Atsuko Yamahiro1, Ming-Jiun Yu2, Daniel J. Aneshansley3 and Klaus W. Beyenbach1,*

1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
2 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
3 Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kwb1{at}cornell.edu)

Accepted 19 November 2007

We present electrical, physiological and molecular evidence for substantial electrical coupling of epithelial cells in Malpighian tubules via gap junctions. Current was injected into one principal cell of the isolated Malpighian tubule and membrane voltage deflections were measured in that cell and in two neighboring principal cells. By short-circuiting the transepithelial voltage with the diuretic peptide leucokinin-VIII we largely eliminated electrical coupling of principal cells through the tubule lumen, thereby allowing coupling through gap junctions to be analyzed. The analysis of an equivalent electrical circuit of the tubule yielded an average gap-junction resistance (Rgj) of 431 k{Omega} between two cells. This resistance would stem from 6190 open gap-junctional channels, assuming the high single gap-junction conductance of 375 pS found in vertebrate tissues. The addition of the calcium ionophore A23187 (2 µmol l–1) to the peritubular Ringer bath containing 1.7 mmol l–1 Ca2+ did not affect the gap-junction resistance, but metabolic inhibition of the tubule with dinitrophenol (0.5 mmol l–1) increased the gap-junction resistance 66-fold, suggesting the regulation of gap junctions by ATP. Lucifer Yellow injected into a principal cell did not appear in neighboring principal cells. Thus, gap junctions allow the passage of current but not Lucifer Yellow. Using RT-PCR we found evidence for the expression of innexins 1, 2, 3 and 7 (named after their homologues in Drosophila) in Malpighian tubules. The physiological demonstration of gap junctions and the molecular evidence for innexin in Malpighian tubules of Aedes aegypti call for the double cable model of the tubule, which will improve the measurement and the interpretation of electrophysiological data collected from Malpighian tubules.

Key words: Malpighian tubule, yellow fever mosquito, electrical coupling, gap-junction resistance, innexin, circuit analysis, cable analysis, ATP







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008