spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 18, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 341-353 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.012682
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Card, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Card, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, M.

Performance trade-offs in the flight initiation of Drosophila

Gwyneth Card* and Michael Dickinson

Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: gwyneth{at}caltech.edu)

Accepted 12 November 2007

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster performs at least two distinct types of flight initiation. One kind is a stereotyped escape response to a visual stimulus that is mediated by the hard-wired giant fiber neural pathway, and the other is a more variable `voluntary' response that can be performed without giant fiber activation. Because the simpler escape take-offs are apparently successful, it is unclear why the fly has multiple pathways to coordinate flight initiation. In this study we use high-speed videography to observe flight initiation in unrestrained wild-type flies and assess the flight performance of each of the two types of take-off. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of take-off sequences indicates that wing use during the jumping phase of flight initiation is essential for stabilizing flight. During voluntary take-offs, early wing elevation leads to a slower and more stable take-off. In contrast, during visually elicited escapes, the wings are pulled down close to the body during take-off, resulting in tumbling flights in which the fly translates faster but also rotates rapidly about all three of its body axes. Additionally, we find evidence that the power delivered by the legs is substantially greater during visually elicited escapes than during voluntary take-offs. Thus, we find that the two types of Drosophila flight initiation result in different flight performances once the fly is airborne, and that these performances are distinguished by a trade-off between speed and stability.

Key words: Drosophila, escape response, giant fiber


Related articles in JEB:

TAKE-OFF TRADE OFF
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Phillips
TAKE-OFF TRADE OFF
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): iii - iii.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008