spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 28, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3800-3807 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.017913
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrewartha, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frappell, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrewartha, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frappell, P. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phenotypic differences in terrestrial frog embryos: effect of water potential and phase

Sarah J. Andrewartha, Nicola J. Mitchell* and Peter B. Frappell{dagger}

Adaptational and Evolutionary Respiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: p.frappell{at}latrobe.edu.au)

Accepted 25 September 2008

The terrestrial embryos of many amphibians obtain water in two ways; in a liquid phase from the substrate on which eggs are deposited, and in a vapour phase from the surrounding atmosphere. We tested whether the mode of water flux (liquid or vapour) affected the morphology and metabolic traits of the terrestrial Victorian smooth froglet (Geocrinia victoriana) embryos by incubating eggs both with a liquid water source and at a range of vapour water potentials. We found that embryos incubated with a liquid water source ({psi}{pi}=0 kPa) were better hydrated than embryos incubated with a vapour water source ({psi}v=0 kPa), and grew to a larger size. Eggs incubated in atmospheres with lower {psi}v values showed significant declines in mass and in the thickness of the jelly capsule, while embryos primarily showed reductions in dry mass, total length, tail length and fin height. The most significant deviations from control ({psi}v=0 kPa) values were observed when the {psi}v of the incubation media was less than the osmotic water potential ({psi}{pi}) of the embryonic interstitial fluid (approximately –425 kPa). Despite the caveat that a {psi}v of 0 kPa is probably difficult to achieve under our experimental conditions, the findings indicate the importance for eggs under natural conditions of contacting liquid water in the nesting substrate to allow swelling of the capsule.

Key words: water balance, water potential, osmotic pressure, vapour pressure, relative humidity, isopiestic, embryo, Geocrinia victoriana, Myobatrachidae, Anura, amphibian


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008