QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 31, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3523-3528 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007187

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wainwright, P. C. Articles by Higham, T. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wainwright, P. C. Articles by Higham, T. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Commentary

Stereotypy, flexibility and coordination: key concepts in behavioral functional morphology

Peter C. Wainwright^1,*, Rita S. Mehta¹ and Timothy E. Higham²

¹ Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
² Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, 132 Long Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: pcwainwright{at}ucdavis.edu)

Accepted 15 September 2008

Animal movement and its muscular control are central topics in functional morphology. As experimentalists we often manipulate stimuli in a controlled setting or compare species to observe the degree of variation in movement and motor control of particular behaviors. Understanding and communicating the biological significance of these sources of variability requires a universal terminology that is presently lacking in the functional morphology literature. We suggest that `stereotypy' be used to refer to the degree of variability observed in a behavior across trials under a given set of conditions. The ability of an organism to alter its behavior across experimental treatments is referred to as `flexibility'. We discuss how there has been a tendency to confound the phenomenon of a behavior exhibiting low variability, which we refer to as stereotyped, with inflexibility, or the inability to alter the behavior in response to a change in stimulus. The degree of stereotypy and flexibility in a behavior need not be correlated, nor need they have a common underlying basis. Coordination, a term used to describe the relationship between different body parts during movement, can be stereotyped and can show flexibility. Stereotypy of coordination can be assessed by the strength of correlations between movements of two body parts. The influence of coordination coherence on behavioral performance has rarely been considered, and could shed light on how taxa differ in their ability to perform behaviors. We suggest definitions of the terms stereotypy, flexibility and coordination, and provide examples of how and when these terms could be used when discussing behavioral changes in functional morphology.

Key words: behavioral integration, kinematics, motor pattern

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?