spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a Workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 28, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 234-238 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.013797
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article, Biomechanics of Flight

Aerodynamic efficiency of flapping flight: analysis of a two-stroke model

Z. Jane Wang

Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

e-mail: jane.wang{at}cornell.edu

Accepted 22 October 2007

Summary

To seek the simplest efficient flapping wing motions and understand their relation to steady flight, a two-stroke model in the quasi-steady limit was analyzed. It was found that a family of two-stroke flapping motions have aerodynamic efficiency close to, but slightly lower than, the optimal steady flight. These two-stroke motions share two common features: the downstroke is a gliding motion and the upstroke has an angle of attack close to the optimal of the steady flight of the same wing. With the reduced number of parameters, the aerodynamic cost function in the parameter space can be visualized. This was examined for wings of different lift and drag characteristics at Reynolds numbers between 102 and 106. The iso-surfaces of the cost function have a tube-like structure, implying that the solution is insensitive to a specific direction in the parameter space. Related questions in insect flight that motivated this work are discussed.

Key words: efficiency, aerodynamics, flapping wing, flight


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

BIOMECHANICS OF SWIMMING AND FLIGHT
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Young, S. M. Walker, R. J. Bomphrey, G. K. Taylor, and A. L. R. Thomas
Details of Insect Wing Design and Deformation Enhance Aerodynamic Function and Flight Efficiency
Science, September 18, 2009; 325(5947): 1549 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. Lentink and M. H. Dickinson
Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2009; 212(16): 2705 - 2719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
A. Hedenstrom and G. Spedding
Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight
J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2008; 5(23): 595 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008