QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online June 13, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2052-2057 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.017194

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, C. L. Articles by Evans, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, C. L. Articles by Evans, C. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Multimodal signaling in fowl, Gallus gallus

Carolynn L. Smith^* and Christopher S. Evans

Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kls{at}galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au)

Accepted 16 April 2008

Many social birds produce food-associated calls. In galliforms, these vocalizations are typically accompanied by a distinctive visual display, creating a multimodal signal known as tidbitting. This system is ideal for experimental analysis of the way in which signal components interact to determine overall efficacy. We used high-definition video playback to explore perception of male tidbitting by female fowl, Gallus gallus. Hens experienced four treatments consisting of multimodal tidbitting, visual tidbitting without sound, audible tidbitting without a male present, and a silent empty cage control. Hens took longer to begin food search when the display was silent, but the overall rate of this response did not differ among the multimodal, visual only or audio only playback treatments. These results suggest that the visual and vocal components of tidbitting are redundant, but they also highlight the importance of a temporal dimension for any categorization scheme. Visual displays also evoked inspection behavior, characterized by close binocular fixation on the head of the playback male, which is known to facilitate individual recognition. This may also allow hens to assess male quality. Such social responses reveal that tidbitting probably has multiple functions and provide a new insight into the selective factors responsible for the evolution of this complex multimodal signal.

Key words: multimodal communication, audiovisual displays, redundancy, tidbitting

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. N. Daisley, E. Mascalzoni, O. Rosa-Salva, R. Rugani, and L. Regolin Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) Phil Trans R Soc B, April 12, 2009; 364(1519): 965 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Smith and C. S. Evans Silent tidbitting in male fowl, Gallus gallus: a referential visual signal with multiple functions J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2009; 212(6): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]