QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 30, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1937-1947 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.014217

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Savage, K. N. Articles by Gosline, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Savage, K. N. Articles by Gosline, J. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The effect of proline on the network structure of major ampullate silks as inferred from their mechanical and optical properties

Ken N. Savage and John M. Gosline^*

Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6K 1Z4

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: gosline{at}zoology.ubc.ca)

Accepted 5 April 2008

The silk that orb-weaving spiders produce for use as dragline and for the frame of the web is spun from the major ampullate (MA) glands, and it is renowned for its exceptional toughness. The fibroins that make up MA silk have previously been organized into two major groupings, spidroin-1 and spidroin-2, based largely on differences in amino acid sequence. The most apparent difference between spidroin-1 and spidroin-2 fibroins is the lack of proline in spidroin-1. The MA silk of Araneus diadematus comprises two spidroin-2 fibroins, and is therefore proline-rich, whereas spidroin-1 is preferentially expressed in Nephila clavipes MA silk, and so this silk is proline deficient. Together, these two silks provide a system for testing the consequences of proline-rich and proline-deficient fibroin networks. This study measures the mechanical and optical properties of dry and hydrated Araneus and Nephila MA silks. Since proline acts to disrupt secondary structure, it is hypothesized that the fibroin network of Araneus MA silk will contain less secondary structure than the network of Nephila MA silk. Mechanical and optical studies clearly support this hypothesis. Although the dry properties of these two silks are indistinguishable, there are large differences between the hydrated silks. Nephila silk does not swell upon hydration to the same degree as Araneus silk. In addition, upon hydration, Nephila MA silk retains more of its initial dry stiffness, and retains more molecular order, as indicated by birefringence measurements.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

SPIDER SILKS CAN BE SPRINGS OR RUBBER

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. A. Blackledge, C. Boutry, S.-C. Wong, A. Baji, A. Dhinojwala, V. Sahni, and I. Agnarsson How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): 1981 - 1989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Phillips SPIDER SILKS CAN BE SPRINGS OR RUBBER J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): i - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. N. Savage and J. M. Gosline The role of proline in the elastic mechanism of hydrated spider silks J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1948 - 1957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]