spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 30, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1868-1873 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.018036
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bregy, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wehner, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bregy, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wehner, R.

Nest-mark orientation versus vector navigation in desert ants

Patrick Bregy*, Stefan Sommer and Rüdiger Wehner{dagger}

Institute of Zoology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: rwehner{at}zool.uzh.ch)

Accepted 3 April 2008

Foraging ants and bees use path-integration vectors and landmark cues for navigation. When in particular experimental paradigms the two types of information – vector-based and landmark-based information – are made to compete with each other, the insect may weight either source more heavily depending on the navigational context and the animal's motivational state. Here we studied the effects of a displaced nest mark on the homing performances of Cataglyphis ants. Foragers were trained to shuttle between the nest, which was marked by a black cylinder (the beacon), and an artificial feeder. Trained ants were captured at the feeder and transferred to a distant test field, where they experienced the nest mark at various positions relative to their home vector. When the beacon was positioned to one side of the point of release, the ants slightly drifted towards the beacon right at the start of their inbound run, but thereafter resumed their home-vector courses. When the nest mark appeared to one side further down the homing course, the ants set off in the home-vector direction, but then gradually drifted towards the beacon. The distance, at which this occurred, and the ants' drift from the home-vector course were very similar across test conditions. During the final search for the nest, landmark information dominated the ants' path integrator. The results clearly show that nest-mark memories are effective during the entire vector-based homeward course, but that they are either only partly activated or partly used unless the state of the ants' path integrator is close to zero.

Key words: beacon, Cataglyphis, home vector, landmark, nest search, path integration


Related articles in JEB:

ANTS RELY ON DUAL NAVIGATION
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: ii. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Phillips
ANTS RELY ON DUAL NAVIGATION
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): ii - ii.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008