QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 2, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1681-1689 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.016436

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lechner, W. Articles by Ladich, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lechner, W. Articles by Ladich, F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Size matters: diversity in swimbladders and Weberian ossicles affects hearing in catfishes

Walter Lechner and Friedrich Ladich^*

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: friedrich.ladich{at}univie.ac.at)

Accepted 4 March 2008

Otophysine fish possess Weberian ossicles, which connect the swimbladder to the inner ear and improve hearing ability. There is a high diversity in the morphology of the swimbladder and Weberian apparatus in catfishes, which might affect hearing. We have examined these structures in representatives of six families with large, single bladders (Ariidae, Auchenipteridae, Heptapteridae, Malapteruridae, Mochokidae, Pseudopimelodidae) and five subfamilies from two families (Callichthyidae, Loricariidae) having small, paired, encapsulated bladders. We tested their hearing abilities utilizing the non-invasive auditory evoked potential recording technique. Species with single, non-encapsulated, free airbladders possess one, three or four ossicles, whereas species with encapsulated bladders possess one or two. The relative sizes of the bladders and ossicles were significantly smaller in the latter group. All species were able to detect sound stimuli between 50 Hz and 5 kHz. Interspecific differences in hearing sensitivity varied at most by 24 dB below 1 kHz, whilst this variation increased to more than 50 dB at higher frequencies. Catfishes with free bladders had lower thresholds above 1 kHz than those having encapsulated ones. The relative lengths of swimbladders and of ossicular chains were correlated with hearing sensitivity above 1 and 2 kHz, respectively. The number of ossicles affected hearing at 4 and 5 kHz. These results indicate that larger bladders and ossicles as well as higher ossicle numbers improve hearing ability at higher frequencies in catfishes. We furthermore assume that the tiny bladders have minimized their hydrostatic function but were not completely lost because of their auditory function.

Key words: auditory evoked potential (AEP), Weberian apparatus, Siluriformes

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

CATFISH PAY BUOYANCY PENALTY

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: ii. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Phillips CATFISH PAY BUOYANCY PENALTY J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2008; 211(10): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]