spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 2, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1668-1680 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.015289
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Meij, M. A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bout, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Meij, M. A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bout, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The relationship between shape of the skull and bite force in finches

Maria A. A. van der Meij and Ron G. Bout*

Evolutionary Morphology, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Clusius Laboratory/EMCA, Wassenaarseweg 64, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: r.g.bout{at}biology.leidenuniv.nl)

Accepted 11 March 2008

In finches husking time is non-linearly related to the ratio of seed hardness to maximal bite force. Fringillids produce larger bite force and husk relatively hard seeds faster than estrildids of similar size. This is at least partly explained by their relatively larger jaw muscle mass and a difference in husking technique. However, the effect of differences in skull geometry on bite force is unclear. In this study differences in skull morphology that may contribute to the difference in bite force between fringillids and estrildids are analyzed. The shape of the skull was described by the 3D coordinates of a set of landmarks and, after eliminating size, the effect of differences in the shape of the skull on bite force was determined using a static force model. EMG recordings of jaw muscles during seed cracking were used to validate assumptions about the muscle activation patterns used for the static bite force model. The analysis shows that most of the variation in skull geometry is related to differences in size. Although the shape of the skull is highly convergent between fringillids and estrildids, the shape of the skull differs significantly between the two groups. A principal component analysis of the landmark coordinates shows several patterns of allometric shape changes, one of which is expressed more strongly in estrildids than in fringillids. Three characters dominate the effect of shape changes on bite force. Bite force increases with a more caudal position of the quadrate, a more downward inclined beak and a relatively short jugal and palatine. A more downward inclined beak is typically found in estrildids. The height of the upper bill and a number of other changes in skull shape have little effect on bite force. An estimate of the relative contributions of jaw muscle size and skull geometry to the difference in bite force between fringillids and estrildids suggests that the contribution of muscle size is much larger than the contribution of skull geometry.

Key words: bite force, feeding, finch, morphometrics, skull


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. M. Eng, S. R. Ward, C. J. Vinyard, and A. B. Taylor
The morphology of the masticatory apparatus facilitates muscle force production at wide jaw gapes in tree-gouging common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2009; 212(24): 4040 - 4055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008