spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 2, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1594-1602 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.017244
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okech, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Boudko, D. Y.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okech, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Boudko, D. Y.

Synergy and specificity of two Na+–aromatic amino acid symporters in the model alimentary canal of mosquito larvae

Bernard A. Okech*, Ella A. Meleshkevitch{dagger}, Melissa M. Miller, Lyudmila B. Popova{ddagger}, William R. Harvey and Dmitri Y. Boudko{dagger},§

The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 Ocean Shore Boulevard, St Augustine, FL 3208, USA

§ Author for correspondence (e-mail: dmitri.boudko{at}rosalindfranklin.edu)

Accepted 17 March 2008

The nutrient amino acid transporter (NAT) subfamily is the largest subdivision of the sodium neurotransmitter symporter family (SNF; also known as SLC6; HUGO). There are seven members of the NAT population in the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae, two of which, AgNAT6 and AgNAT8, preferably transport indole- and phenyl-branched substrates, respectively. The relative expression and distribution of these aromatic NATs were examined with transporter-specific antibodies in Xenopus oocytes and mosquito larval alimentary canal, representing heterologous and tissue expression systems, respectively. NAT-specific aromatic-substrate-induced currents strongly corresponded with specific accumulation of both transporters in the plasma membrane of oocytes. Immunolabeling revealed elevated expressions of both transporters in specific regions of the larval alimentary canal, including salivary glands, cardia, gastric caeca, posterior midgut and Malpighian tubules. Differences in relative expression densities and spatial distribution of the transporters were prominent in virtually all of these regions, suggesting unique profiles of the aromatic amino acid absorption. For the first time reversal of the location of a transporter between apical and basal membranes was identified in posterior and anterior epithelial domains corresponding with secretory and absorptive epithelial functions, respectively. Both aromatic NATs formed putative homodimers in the larval gut whereas functional monomers were over-expressed heterologously in Xenopus oocytes. The results unequivocally suggest functional synergy between substrate-specific AgNAT6 and AgNAT8 in intracellular absorption of aromatic amino acids. More broadly, they suggest that the specific selectivity, regional expression and polarized membrane docking of NATs represent key adaptive traits shaping functional patterns of essential amino acid absorption in the metazoan alimentary canal and other tissues.

Key words: insect, mosquito, essential amino acid, nutrient amino acid transporter, NAT, co-transporter, phenylalanine, tryptophan, monoamine neurotransmitter, malaria, Anopheles gambiae






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008