spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 20, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1632-1640 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.002691
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dow, J. A. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dow, J. A. T.

Review Article

Integrative physiology, functional genomics and the phenotype gap: a guide for comparative physiologists

Julian A. T. Dow

Division of Molecular Genetics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G11 6NU, UK

e-mail: j.a.t.dow{at}bio.gla.ac.uk

Accepted 23 January 2007

Classical, curiosity-led comparative physiology finds itself at a crossroads. Major funding for classical physiology is becoming harder to find, as grant agencies focus on more molecular approaches or on science with more immediate strategic value to their respective countries. In turn, this shift in funding places Zoology and Animal Science departments under enormous stress: student numbers are buoyant, but how can research funding be maintained at high levels?

Our research group has argued for the redefinition of integrative physiology as the investigation of gene function in an organotypic context in the intact animal. Implicit in this definition is the use of transgenics and reverse genetics to manipulate gene function in a cell-specific manner; this in turn implies the use of a genetically tractable `model organism'. The significance of this definition is that it aligns integrative physiology with functional genomics. Again, functional genomics draws heavily on reverse genetics to elucidate the function of novel genes. The phenotype gap (the mismatch between what a genetic model organism's genome encodes and the reasons that it has historically been studied) emphasises the need to attract and empower functional biologists: can all 13 500 genes in Drosophila really be explained in terms of developmental biology? So, by embracing the integrative physiology manifesto, comparative physiologists can not only accelerate their own research, but their functional skills can make them indispensable in the post-genomic endeavour.

Key words: Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Danio rerio, mouse, Malpighian tubule, bioinformatics


Related articles in JEB:

CLOSING THE GENOTYPE–PHENOTYPE GAP
Laura Blackburn
JEB 2007 210: iii. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Vogt, M. Huber, M. Thiemann, G. van den Boogaart, O. J. Schmitz, and C. D. Schubart
Production of different phenotypes from the same genotype in the same environment by developmental variation
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 510 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007