|
| ![]() |
|
||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 31, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1398-1405 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02752
The effect of decoupling olfactory and visual stimuli on the foraging behavior of Manduca sexta
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Coker Life Sciences Building, 700
Sumter Street, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208,
USA
2 Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jgoyret{at}biol.sc.edu)
Accepted 12 February 2007
Within an appetitive context, Manduca sexta, a nectivorous nocturnal hawkmoth, can be attracted by a range of stimuli including floral volatiles and visual display, carbon dioxide and water vapor. Several studies on this and other flower-visiting insects have shown how olfactory and visual stimulation play (or do not play) a role in attraction and feeding. Nevertheless, these studies have consistently manipulated stimuli in a `presenceabsence' manner. Here, we experimentally decoupled the presentation of both stimuli spatially and temporally in a wind tunnel, rather than entirely eliminating either one, and found that the decision-making process based on these stimuli is more flexible and complex than previously asserted. Manduca sexta was most responsive when both cues were present and emanated from the same source. When stimuli were spatially separated, responsiveness levels were comparable to those elicited by a single stimulus. However, transient olfactory stimulation either before or after visually guided approach (temporal decoupling) enhanced responsiveness to an odorless visual target. Additionally, searching times were increased by either a transient olfactory stimulation before take-off or by having the flower model spatially separated from the odor source tracked by the moths. Finally, in a dual-choice experiment, moths showed a strong bias for the visual display over the odor plume, suggesting the former to be the ultimate indicator of a nectar source. Our manipulation of floral cues shows that the feeding behavior of M. sexta, and probably of other nectivorous insects, is based not only on the sensory stimulation per se but also on the temporal and spatial pattern in which these stimuli are perceived.
Key words: olfactory stimulus, sensory stimulus, temporal pattern, spatial pattern, temporal decoupling, hawkmoth
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Vereecken and F. P. Schiestl On the roles of colour and scent in a specialized floral mimicry system Ann. Bot., November 1, 2009; 104(6): 1077 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Goyret, A. Kelber, M. Pfaff, and R. A. Raguso Flexible responses to visual and olfactory stimuli by foraging Manduca sexta: larval nutrition affects adult behaviour Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2009; 276(1668): 2739 - 2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Harley, B. A. English, and R. E. Ritzmann Characterization of obstacle negotiation behaviors in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2009; 212(10): 1463 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Theis, K. Kesler, and L. S. Adler Leaf herbivory increases floral fragrance in male but not female Cucurbita pepo subsp. texana (Cucurbitaceae) flowers Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 897 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Balkenius, S. Bisch-Knaden, and B. Hansson Interaction of visual and odour cues in the mushroom body of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2009; 212(4): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Goyret, P. M. Markwell, and R. A. Raguso Chemical Ecology Special Feature: Context- and scale-dependent effects of floral CO2 on nectar foraging by Manduca sexta PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4565 - 4570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Blackburn MOTHS MAKE DECISIONS J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||