QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 16, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1255-1265 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02742

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McGowan, C. P. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McGowan, C. P. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Modulation of proximal muscle function during level versus incline hopping in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii)

C. P. McGowan^1,*, R. V. Baudinette^2, and A. A. Biewener¹

¹ Concord Field Station, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
² Department of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5003, Australia

^* Author for correspondence at present address: Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA (e-mail: mcgowac{at}colorado.edu)

Accepted 30 January 2007

We examined the functional role of two major proximal leg extensor muscles of tammar wallabies during level and inclined hopping (12°, 21.3% grade). Previous in vivo studies of hopping wallabies have revealed that, unlike certain avian bipeds, distal hindlimb muscles do not alter their force–length behavior to contribute positive work during incline hopping. This suggests that proximal muscles produce the increased mechanical work associated with moving up an incline. Based on relative size and architectural anatomy, we hypothesized that the biceps femoris (BF), primarily a hip extensor, and the vastus lateralis (VL), the main knee extensor, would exhibit changes in muscle strain and activation patterns consistent with increased work production during incline versus level hopping. Our results clearly support this hypothesis. The BF experienced similar activation patterns during level and incline hopping but net fascicle shortening increased (–0.5% for level hopping versus –4.2% for incline hopping) during stance when the muscle likely generated force. Unlike the BF, the VL experienced active net lengthening during stance, indicating that it absorbs energy during both level and incline hopping. However, during incline hopping, net lengthening was reduced (8.3% for level hopping versus 3.9% for incline hopping), suggesting that the amount of energy absorbed by the VL was reduced. Consequently, the changes in contractile behavior of these two muscles are consistent with a net production of work by the whole limb. A subsidiary aim of our study was to explore possible regional variation within the VL. Although there was slightly higher fascicle strain in the proximal VL compared with the distal VL, regional differences in strain were not significant, suggesting that the overall pattern of in vivo strain is fairly uniform throughout the muscle. Estimates of muscle work based on inverse dynamics calculations support the conclusion that both the BF and VL contribute to the additional work required for incline hopping. However, on a muscle mass-specific basis, these two muscles appear to contribute less than their share. This indicates that other hindlimb muscles, or possibly trunk and back muscles, must contribute substantial work during incline hopping.

Key words: locomotion, hopping, muscle, electromyography, sonomicrometry, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

WALLABIES HOP HARDER

Laura Blackburn
JEB 2007 210: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. McGuigan, E. Yoo, D. V. Lee, and A. A. Biewener Dynamics of goat distal hind limb muscle-tendon function in response to locomotor grade J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): 2092 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Sawicki and D. P. Ferris Mechanics and energetics of incline walking with robotic ankle exoskeletons J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 32 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Carroll, D. V. Lee, and A. A. Biewener Differential muscle function between muscle synergists: long and lateral heads of the triceps in jumping and landing goats (Capra hircus) J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1262 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham and A. A. Biewener Integration within and between muscles during terrestrial locomotion: effects of incline and speed J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2008; 211(14): 2303 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Biewener and M. A. Daley Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2949 - 2960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Blackburn WALLABIES HOP HARDER J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): i - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]