|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 16, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1139-1147 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02741
Disruptive coloration in cuttlefish: a visual perception mechanism that regulates ontogenetic adjustment of skin patterning
1 Marine Resources Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL Street, Woods
Hole, MA 02543, USA
2 Department of Cognitive Sciences and Institute for Mathematical Behavioral
Sciences, University of California at Irvine, USA
3 Department of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013,
Taiwan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: abarbosa{at}mbl.edu)
Accepted 29 January 2007
Among the changeable camouflage patterns of cuttlefish, disruptive patterning is shown in response to certain features of light objects in the visual background. However, whether animals show disruptive patterns is dependent not only on object size but also on their body size. Here, we tested whether cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) are able to match their disruptive body patterning with increasing size of background objects as they grow from hatchling to adult size (0.7 to 19.6 cm mantle length; factor of 28). Specifically, do cuttlefish have a single `visual sampling rule' that scales accurately during ontogeny?
For each of seven size classes of cuttlefish, we created black and white checkerboards whose check sizes corresponded to 4, 12, 40, 120, 400 and 1200% of the area of the cuttlefish's White square, which is a neurophysiologically controlled component of the skin. Disruptive body patterns were evoked when, regardless of animal size, the check size measured either 40 or 120% of the area of the cuttlefish's White square, thus demonstrating a remarkable ontogenetic conformity to a single visual sampling rule.
Cuttlefish have no known visual feedback loop with which to adjust their skin patterns. Since the area of a cuttlefish's White square skin component is a function of body size, our results indicate that cuttlefish are solving a visual scaling problem of camouflage presumably without visual confirmation of the size of their own skin component.
Key words: camouflage, Sepia officinalis, visual sensori-motor system, crypsis, chromatophore, cephalopod
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Zylinski, D. Osorio, and A. J. Shohet Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2009; 276(1675): 3963 - 3969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M Mathger, E. J Denton, N. J. Marshall, and R. T Hanlon Mechanisms and behavioural functions of structural coloration in cephalopods J R Soc Interface, April 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_2): S149 - S163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.T Hanlon, C.-C Chiao, L.M Mathger, A Barbosa, K.C Buresch, and C Chubb Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration Phil Trans R Soc B, February 27, 2009; 364(1516): 429 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Zylinski, D Osorio, and A.J Shohet Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis Phil Trans R Soc B, February 27, 2009; 364(1516): 439 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Stuart-Fox and A. Moussalli Camouflage, communication and thermoregulation: lessons from colour changing organisms Phil Trans R Soc B, February 27, 2009; 364(1516): 463 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Kelman, D. Osorio, and R. J. Baddeley A review of cuttlefish camouflage and object recognition and evidence for depth perception J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1757 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Mathger, C.-C. Chiao, A. Barbosa, K. C. Buresch, S. Kaye, and R. T. Hanlon Disruptive coloration elicited on controlled natural substrates in cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2657 - 2666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||