spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 2, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 971-982 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02728
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kram, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kram, R.

Limitations to maximum running speed on flat curves

Young-Hui Chang1,* and Rodger Kram2

1 Comparative Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0356, USA
2 Locomotion Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: yh.chang{at}gatech.edu)

Accepted 17 January 2007

Why is maximal running speed reduced on curved paths? The leading explanation proposes that an increase in lateral ground reaction force necessitates a decrease in peak vertical ground reaction force, assuming that maximum leg extension force is the limiting factor. Yet, no studies have directly measured these forces or tested this critical assumption. We measured maximum sprint velocities and ground reaction forces for five male humans sprinting along a straight track and compared them to sprints along circular tracks of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 m radii. Circular track sprint trials were performed either with or without a tether that applied centripetal force to the center of mass. Sprinters generated significantly smaller peak resultant ground reaction forces during normal curve sprinting compared to straight sprinting. This provides direct evidence against the idea that maximum leg extension force is always achieved and is the limiting factor. Use of the tether increased sprint speed, but not to expected values. During curve sprinting, the inside leg consistently generated smaller peak forces compared to the outside leg. Several competing biomechanical constraints placed on the stance leg during curve sprinting likely make the inside leg particularly ineffective at generating the ground reaction forces necessary to attain maximum velocities comparable to straight path sprinting. The ability of quadrupeds to redistribute function across multiple stance legs and decouple these multiple constraints may provide a distinct advantage for turning performance.

Key words: turning, maneuverability, curve, sprinting, running, locomotion, biomechanics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. L. Jindrich, N. C. Smith, K. Jespers, and A. M. Wilson
Mechanics of cutting maneuvers by ostriches (Struthio camelus)
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1378 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007