|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 2, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1075-1083 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02727
Does the metabolic rate–flight speed relationship vary among geometrically similar birds of different mass?
Flight Laboratory, Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
* Author for correspondence at present address: Biomechanics Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, Division of Kinesiology and Health, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA (e-mail: mbundle{at}uwyo.edu)
Accepted 17 January 2007
Based on aerodynamic considerations, the energy use–flight speed relationship of all airborne animals and aircraft should be U-shaped. However, measures of the metabolic rate–flight speed relationship in birds have been available since Tucker's pioneering experiments with budgerigars nearly forty years ago, but this classic work remains the only study to have found a clearly U-shaped metabolic power curve. The available data suggests that the energetic requirements for flight within this species are unique, yet the metabolic power curve of the budgerigar is widely considered representative of birds in general. Given these conflicting results and the observation that the budgerigar's mass is less than 50% of the next smallest species to have been studied, we asked whether large and small birds have metabolic power curves of different shapes. To address this question we measured the rates of oxygen uptake and wingbeat kinematics in budgerigars and cockatiels flying within a variable-speed wind tunnel. These species are close phylogenetic relatives, have similar flight styles, wingbeat kinematics, and are geometrically similar but have body masses that differ by a factor of two. In contrast to our expectations, we found the metabolic rate–flight speed relationship of both species to be acutely U-shaped. We also found that neither budgerigars nor cockatiels used their normal intermittent flight style while wearing a respirometric mask. We conclude that species size differences alone do not explain the previously unique metabolic power curve of the budgerigar; however, due to the absence of comparable data we cannot evaluate whether the mask-related kinematic response we document influences the metabolic rate–flight speed relationship of these parrots, or whether the energetics of flight differ between this and other avian clades.)
Key words: bird flight, power curve, metabolic rate
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. W. Bundle OXYGEN UPTAKE OF FLYING BUDGERIGARS BY V. A. TUCKER J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2009; 212(22): 3595 - 3596. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Berg and A. A. Biewener Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1120 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Ellerby and G. N. Askew Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3780 - 3788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Ellerby and G. N. Askew Modulation of pectoralis muscle function in budgerigars Melopsitaccus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata in response to changing flight speed J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3789 - 3797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
