|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online November 19, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 4104-4122 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007930
Phylogenetic comparative analysis of electric communication signals in ghost knifefishes (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae)
1 Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405,
USA
2 Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior (CISAB), Indiana
University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
3 CISAB Research Experience for Undergraduates Program, Indiana University,
Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
4 Dominican University, River Forest, IL 60305, USA
5 Laboratório de Fisiologia Comportamental (LFC), Instituto Nacional
de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, AM 69083-000, Brazil
6 Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Division of
Fishes, Washington, DC 20560, USA
7 Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405,
USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: turnercr{at}gmail.com)
Accepted 30 August 2007
Electrocommunication signals in electric fish are diverse, easily recorded and have well-characterized neural control. Two signal features, the frequency and waveform of the electric organ discharge (EOD), vary widely across species. Modulations of the EOD (i.e. chirps and gradual frequency rises) also function as active communication signals during social interactions, but they have been studied in relatively few species. We compared the electrocommunication signals of 13 species in the largest gymnotiform family, Apteronotidae. Playback stimuli were used to elicit chirps and rises. We analyzed EOD frequency and waveform and the production and structure of chirps and rises. Species diversity in these signals was characterized with discriminant function analyses, and correlations between signal parameters were tested with phylogenetic comparative methods. Signals varied markedly across species and even between congeners and populations of the same species. Chirps and EODs were particularly evolutionarily labile, whereas rises differed little across species. Although all chirp parameters contributed to species differences in these signals, chirp amplitude modulation, frequency modulation (FM) and duration were particularly diverse. Within this diversity, however, interspecific correlations between chirp parameters suggest that mechanistic trade-offs may shape some aspects of signal evolution. In particular, a consistent trade-off between FM and EOD amplitude during chirps is likely to have influenced the evolution of chirp structure. These patterns suggest that functional or mechanistic linkages between signal parameters (e.g. the inability of electromotor neurons increase their firing rates without a loss of synchrony or amplitude of action potentials) constrain the evolution of signal structure.
Key words: communication, behavior, signal evolution, comparative approach, phylogenetic analysis, electric fish, chirping
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Fugere and R. Krahe Electric signals and species recognition in the wave-type gymnotiform fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2010; 213(2): 225 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Hupe and J. E. Lewis Electrocommunication signals in free swimming brown ghost knifefish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2008; 211(10): 1657 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||