QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 19, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3780-3788 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.006288

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ellerby, D. J. Articles by Askew, G. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ellerby, D. J. Articles by Askew, G. N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance

David J. Ellerby^* and Graham N. Askew

Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Author for correspondence (e-mail: g.n.askew{at}leeds.ac.uk)

Accepted 17 July 2007

The pectoralis muscles are the main source of mechanical power for avian flight. The power output of these muscles must be modulated to meet the changing power requirements of flight across a range of speeds. This can be achieved at the muscle level by manipulation of strain trajectory and recruitment patterns, and/or by intermittent flight strategies. We have measured the in vitro power outputs of pectoralis muscle fascicles from budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata under conditions replicating those previously measured in vivo during flight. This has allowed us to quantify the extent to which different power modulation mechanisms control flight muscle power output. Intermittent flight behaviour is a more important determinant of flight power in zebra finches than budgerigars. This behaviour accounts for 25–62% of power modulation relative to the maximum available mechanical power output in zebra finch, compared to 0–38% in budgerigars. Muscle level changes in fascicle strain trajectory and motor unit recruitment, rather than intermittent flight behaviours, are the main determinants of pectoralis muscle power output in budgerigars at all speeds, and in zebra finch at speeds below 14 m s^–1.

Key words: power, modulation, flight

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Marden, H. W. Fescemyer, M. Saastamoinen, S. P. MacFarland, J. C. Vera, M. J. Frilander, and I. Hanski Weight and nutrition affect pre-mRNA splicing of a muscle gene associated with performance, energetics and life history J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2008; 211(23): 3653 - 3660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Ellerby and G. N. Askew Modulation of pectoralis muscle function in budgerigars Melopsitaccus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata in response to changing flight speed J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3789 - 3797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]