QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 19, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3720-3727 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.008417

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marshall, D. J. Articles by Bolton, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marshall, D. J. Articles by Bolton, T. F.

Sperm release strategies in marine broadcast spawners: the costs of releasing sperm quickly

Dustin J. Marshall^1,* and Toby F. Bolton²

¹ School of Integrative Biology/Centre for Marine Studies, University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Australia
² Lincoln Marine Science Centre, School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, 5606, SA, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: d.marshall1{at}uq.edu.au)

Accepted 17 July 2007

When under competition for fertilisations, males are thought to increase their reproductive success by releasing as many sperm as possible into the reproductive arena and in many species, this prediction holds. For marine invertebrates, which utilise the ancestral strategy of broadcast spawning eggs and sperm, however, it appears that males tend to release their sperm more slowly than females release their eggs. Marine invertebrate eggs typically have a relatively slow permanent block to polyspermy (whereby eggs become impermeable to further sperm attachment), and for several minutes after fertilisation, sperm can continue to attach to a fertilised egg. We hypothesised that releasing sperm slowly minimises the `wastage' of sperm on already fertilised eggs. We simulated different sperm release rates in a flume using the broadcast spawning polychaete, Galeolaria caespitosa. Sperm release rates strongly affected overall fertilisation success: higher release rates resulted in lower fertilisation rates. Laboratory studies confirmed that the `permanent' block to polyspermy in G. caespitosa took less than a minute to form but this lag was sufficient to result in some sperm wastage. Thus upstream, fertilised eggs that have not formed a permanent block to polyspermy can remove sperm from the pool that would otherwise fertilise downstream sibling eggs. We suggest that while electrical blocks to polyspermy evolved in response to excess sperm, permanent blocks to polyspermy could have evolved in response to sperm limitation (insufficient sperm).

Key words: fertilisation, polyspermy, sperm competition