|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online January 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 181-186 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02629
Commentary |
Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists
1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University,
Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
2 Mammal Lab, New York State Museum, CEC 3140, Albany, NY 12230,
USA
3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University,
Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
4 Copenhagen Bird Ringing Centre, Zoological Museum, University of
Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
5 Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
6 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of
Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801,
USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: wikelski{at}princeton.edu)
Accepted 26 October 2006
Tracking animals over large temporal and spatial scales has revealed
invaluable and spectacular biological information, particularly when the paths
and fates of individuals can be monitored on a global scale. However, only
large animals (greater than
300 g) currently can be followed globally
because of power and size constraints on the tracking devices. And yet the
vast majority of animals is small. Tracking small animals is important because
they are often part of evolutionary and ecological experiments, they provide
important ecosystem services and they are of conservation concern or pose harm
to human health. Here, we propose a small-animal satellite tracking system
that would enable the global monitoring of animals down to the size of the
smallest birds, mammals (bats), marine life and eventually large insects. To
create the scientific framework necessary for such a global project, we formed
the ICARUS initiative
(www.IcarusInitiative.org),
the International Cooperation for Animal Research Using Space. ICARUS also
highlights how small-animal tracking could address some of the `Grand
Challenges in Environmental Sciences' identified by the US National Academy of
Sciences, such as the spread of infectious diseases or the relationship
between biological diversity and ecosystem functioning. Small-animal tracking
would allow the quantitative assessment of dispersal and migration in natural
populations and thus help solve enigmas regarding population dynamics,
extinctions and invasions. Experimental biologists may find a global
small-animal tracking system helpful in testing, validating and expanding
laboratory-derived discoveries in wild, natural populations. We suggest that
the relatively modest investment into a global small-animal tracking system
will pay off by providing unprecedented insights into both basic and applied
nature.
Tracking small animals over large spatial and temporal scales could prove to be one of the most powerful techniques of the early 21st century, offering potential solutions to a wide range of biological and societal questions that date back two millennia to the Greek philosopher Aristotle's enigma about songbird migration. Several of the more recent Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, such as the regulation and functional consequences of biological diversity or the surveillance of the population ecology of zoonotic hosts, pathogens or vectors, could also be addressed by a global small-animal tracking system.
Our discussion is intended to contribute to an emerging groundswell of scientific support to make such a new technological system happen.
Key words: small animal, ICARUS initiative, migration pattern, migratory bird orientation, satellite, field experiments, tracking technology, telemetry, songbird, bat, insect
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Thorup and R. A. Holland The bird GPS - long-range navigation in migrants J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2009; 212(22): 3597 - 3604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Coppack and F. Pulido Proximate control and adaptive potential of protandrous migration in birds Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 49(5): 493 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nathan, W. M. Getz, E. Revilla, M. Holyoak, R. Kadmon, D. Saltz, and P. E. Smouse Movement Ecology Special Feature: A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research PNAS, December 9, 2008; 105(49): 19052 - 19059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Kunz, S. A. Gauthreaux Jr, N. I. Hristov, J. W. Horn, G. Jones, E. K. V. Kalko, R. P. Larkin, G. F. McCracken, S. M. Swartz, R. B. Srygley, et al. Aeroecology: probing and modeling the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Srygley and R. Dudley Optimal strategies for insects migrating in the flight boundary layer: mechanisms and consequences Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 119 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Thorup, I.-A. Bisson, M. S. Bowlin, R. A. Holland, J. C. Wingfield, M. Ramenofsky, and M. Wikelski Evidence for a navigational map stretching across the continental U.S. in a migratory songbird PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 18115 - 18119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||