QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online September 14, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3328-3336 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.008292

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Holzman, R. Articles by Wainwright, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holzman, R. Articles by Wainwright, P. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Timing is everything: coordination of strike kinematics affects the force exerted by suction feeding fish on attached prey

Roi Holzman^1,*, Steven W. Day² and Peter C. Wainwright¹

¹ Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
² Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, 76 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5604, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: raholzman{at}ucdavis.edu)

Accepted 17 July 2007

During aquatic suction feeding, the predator opens its mouth and rapidly expands its buccal cavity, generating a flow field external to the mouth. The rapid expansion of the buccal cavity produces high fluid velocities and accelerations that extend only a short distance from the mouth (about half of one mouth diameter), and only persist for several milliseconds. Therefore, the predator must precisely time its strike to locate the prey within the narrow region of high flow, during the brief period when flow is at its peak. With flow being the agent for transferring force to the prey, the predator may enhance these forces by producing higher water velocities and faster acceleration at the mouth, but also through increasing the strike's accuracy, i.e. locating the prey closer to the mouth at the instant of peak flow speed. The objectives of this study were to directly measure forces exerted by bluegill Lepomis macrochirus on their prey and to determine how bluegill modify force output. Bluegill were offered ghost shrimp tethered to a load cell that recorded force at 5000 Hz, and feeding sequences were synchronously recorded using 500 Hz video. Peak forces exerted on attached 20 mm shrimp ranged from 0.005 N to 0.506 N. In accordance with the short duration of the strikes (average time to peak gape of 13 ms), the forces recorded were brief (12 ms from initiation to peak force), and force magnitude declined rapidly after peak force. Statistical analysis indicated that rate of buccal expansion, and prey size, but not strike initiation distance, significantly affected peak force. These observed variables were used with results from flow visualization studies to estimate the flow at the prey's location, which allowed the calculation of drag, pressure gradient force and acceleration reaction force. The relationship between these calculated forces and the measured forces was strong, indicating that the model can be used to estimate forces from strike kinematics. This model was then used to study the effects of strike initiation distance on peak force and on the rate of increasing force. Comparisons of model output to empirical results indicated that bluegill time their strike so as to exert an average of 70% of the peak possible force on the prey, and that the observed strike initiation distance corresponded to the distance that maximized modeled force on an attached prey. Our results highlight the ability of bluegill to produce high forces on their prey, and indicate that precision and visual acuity play important roles in prey acquisition, beyond their recognized role in prey detection.

Key words: Lepomis macrochirus, kinematics, prey capture, strike performance accuracy, suction feeding, force

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Van Wassenbergh and P. Aerts Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling J R Soc Interface, February 6, 2009; 6(31): 149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Holzman, S. W Day, R. S Mehta, and P. C Wainwright Jaw protrusion enhances forces exerted on prey by suction feeding fishes J R Soc Interface, December 6, 2008; 5(29): 1445 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Wainwright, R. S. Mehta, and T. E. Higham Stereotypy, flexibility and coordination: key concepts in behavioral functional morphology J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2008; 211(22): 3523 - 3528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L Bishop, P. C Wainwright, and R. Holzman Anterior-to-posterior wave of buccal expansion in suction feeding fishes is critical for optimizing fluid flow velocity profile J R Soc Interface, November 6, 2008; 5(28): 1309 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Holzman, S. W. Day, R. S. Mehta, and P. C. Wainwright Integrating the determinants of suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2008; 211(20): 3296 - 3305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Holzman, D. C. Collar, S. W. Day, K. L. Bishop, and P. C. Wainwright Scaling of suction-induced flows in bluegill: morphological and kinematic predictors for the ontogeny of feeding performance J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2008; 211(16): 2658 - 2668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Marshall, K. M. Kovacs, and C. Lydersen Feeding kinematics, suction and hydraulic jetting capabilities in bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]