spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 14, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3319-3327 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.006189
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Summers, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porter, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Summers, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The contribution of mineral to the material properties of vertebral cartilage from the smooth-hound shark Mustelus californicus

Marianne E. Porter1,*, Thomas J. Koob2 and Adam P. Summers1

1 Comparative and Evolutionary Physiology, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 321 Steinhaus Hall, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525, USA
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: porterm{at}uci.edu)

Accepted 17 July 2007

Elasmobranch vertebral cartilage has a substantial mineral fraction (39–55%) and the arrangement of mineral varies among species. We examined vertebrae from one shark species, Mustelus californicus, to determine mineral content, the effect of mineral on material properties and the viscoelastic response of vertebral cartilage. We serially demineralized vertebrae and compressively tested them to failure at varying strain rates. Mineral in vertebral cartilage varies within individuals, intraspecifically and interspecifically; this is in contrast to bone, in which significant variation in mineral content is pathological or an interspecific effect. Within Mustelus, vertebrae with larger mineral fractions were significantly stiffer and stronger; however when variation is assessed across species, the structure has a larger effect. Shark vertebral cartilage did not show a substantial viscoelastic response at biologically relevant strain rates, validating the use of quasistatic testing for this material.

Key words: elasmobranch cartilage, mineral content, stiffness, strength, viscoelastic, elastic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

MINERAL PROVIDES MATERIAL BENEFIT
Sarah Clare
JEB 2007 210: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Clare
MINERAL PROVIDES MATERIAL BENEFIT
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007