QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 31, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3218-3227 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007807

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duistermars, B. J. Articles by Frye, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duistermars, B. J. Articles by Frye, M. A.

The spatial, temporal and contrast properties of expansion and rotation flight optomotor responses in Drosophila

Brian J. Duistermars, Dawnis M. Chow, Michael Condro and Mark A. Frye^*

Department of Physiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: frye{at}physci.ucla.edu)

Accepted 13 July 2007

Fruit flies respond to panoramic retinal patterns of visual expansion with robust steering maneuvers directed away from the focus of expansion to avoid collisions and maintain an upwind flight posture. Panoramic rotation elicits comparatively weak syndirectional steering maneuvers, which also maintain visual stability. Full-field optic flow patterns like expansion and rotation are elicited by distinct flight maneuvers such as body translation during straight flight or body rotation during hovering, respectively. Recent analyses suggest that under some experimental conditions the rotation optomotor response reflects the linear sum of different expansion response components. Are expansion and rotation-mediated visual stabilization responses part of a single optomotor response subserved by a neural circuit that is differentially stimulated by the two flow fields, or rather do the two behavioral responses reflect two distinct control systems? Guided by the principle that the properties of neural circuits are revealed in the behaviors they mediate, we systematically varied the spatial, temporal and contrast properties of expansion and rotation stimuli, and quantified the time course and amplitude of optomotor responses during tethered flight. Our results support the conclusion that expansion and rotation optomotor responses are indeed two separate reflexes, which draw from the same system of elementary motion detectors, but are likely mediated by separate pre-motor circuits having different spatial integration properties, low-pass characteristics and contrast sensitivity.

Key words: vision, optic flow, insect flight, motor control, wing kinematics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Chow and M. A. Frye Context-dependent olfactory enhancement of optomotor flight control in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2478 - 2485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mronz and F.-O. Lehmann The free-flight response of Drosophila to motion of the visual environment J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2026 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]