spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 17, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2979-2989 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.006437
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, K. H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, K. H. S.

Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up

Robert W. Blake* and Keith H. S. Chan

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: blake{at}zoology.ubc.ca)

Accepted 27 June 2007

Synodontis nigriventris is a surface-feeding facultative air-breather that swims inverted with its zoological ventral side towards the water surface. Their near-surface drag is about double the deeply submerged drag (due to wave drag) and roughly twice the sum of frictional and pressure drags. For streamlined technical bodies, values of wave drag augmentation near the surface may be five times the deeply submerged values. However, the depth dependence of drag is similar for fish and streamlined technical bodies, with augmentation vanishing at about 3 body diameters below the surface. Drag `inverted' is approximately 15% less than that `dorsal side up' near the surface. Consistent with this, at any given velocity, tailbeat frequency is lower and stride length higher for inverted swimming in surface proximity (P<0.05). Deeply submerged, there are no significant differences in drag and kinematics between postures (P>0.05). At the critical Froude number of 0.45, speeds in surface proximity correspond to prolonged swimming that ends in fatigue. To exceed these speeds, the fish must swim deeply submerged and this behaviour is observed. Inverted swimming facilitates efficient air breathing. Drag dorsal side up during aquatic surface respiration is 1.5 times the value for the inverted posture. Fast-starts are rectilinear, directly away from the stimulus. Average and maximum velocity and acceleration decrease in surface proximity (P<0.05) and are higher inverted (maximum acceleration: 20–30 m s–2; P<0.05) and comparable to locomotor generalists (e.g. trout). Mechanical energy losses due to wave generation are about 20% for inverted and 40% for dorsal side up, and lower than for trout fast-starting in shallow water (70% losses); bottom effects and large amplitude C-starts (c.f. relatively low amplitude rectilinear motions in S. nigriventris) enhance resistance in trout. S. nigriventris probably evolved from a diurnal or crepuscular `Chiloglanis-like' benthic ancestor. Nocturnality and reverse countershading likely co-evolved with the inverted habit. Presumably, the increased energy cost of surface swimming is offset by exploiting the air–water interface for food and/or air breathing.

Key words: drag, steady swimming bouts, fast-starts, body posture and orientation, depth, feeding, ventilation






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007