QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 17, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2949-2960 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.005801

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Biewener, A. A. Articles by Daley, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Biewener, A. A. Articles by Daley, M. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Commentary

Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control

Andrew A. Biewener^1,*, and Monica A. Daley^2,*

¹ Concord Field Station, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 01238, USA
² Department of Movement Science, Division of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Author for correspondence (e-mail: abiewener{at}oeb.harvard.edu)

Accepted 12 June 2007

By integrating studies of muscle function with analysis of whole body and limb dynamics, broader appreciation of neuromuscular function can be achieved. Ultimately, such studies need to address non-steady locomotor behaviors relevant to animals in their natural environments. When animals move slowly they likely rely on voluntary coordination of movement involving higher brain centers. However, when moving fast, their movements depend more strongly on responses controlled at more local levels. Our focus here is on control of fast-running locomotion. A key observation emerging from studies of steady level locomotion is that simple spring-mass dynamics, which help to economize energy expenditure, also apply to stabilization of unsteady running. Spring-mass dynamics apply to conditions that involve lateral impulsive perturbations, sudden changes in terrain height, and sudden changes in substrate stiffness or damping. Experimental investigation of unsteady locomotion is challenging, however, due to the variability inherent in such behaviors. Another emerging principle is that initial conditions associated with postural changes following a perturbation define different context-dependent stabilization responses. Distinct stabilization modes following a perturbation likely result from proximo-distal differences in limb muscle architecture, function and control strategy. Proximal muscles may be less sensitive to sudden perturbations and appear to operate, in such circumstances, under feed-forward control. In contrast, multiarticular distal muscles operate, via their tendons, to distribute energy among limb joints in a manner that also depends on the initial conditions of limb contact with the ground. Intrinsic properties of these distal muscle–tendon elements, in combination with limb and body dynamics, appear to provide rapid initial stabilizing mechanisms that are often consistent with spring-mass dynamics. These intrinsic mechanisms likely help to simplify the neural control task, in addition to compensating for delays inherent to subsequent force- and length-dependent neural feedback. Future work will benefit from integrative biomechanical approaches that employ a combination of modeling and experimental techniques to understand how the elegant interplay of intrinsic muscle properties, body dynamics and neural control allows animals to achieve stability and agility over a variety of conditions.

Key words: EMG, force, muscle strain, spring-mass, work

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. McGuigan, E. Yoo, D. V. Lee, and A. A. Biewener Dynamics of goat distal hind limb muscle-tendon function in response to locomotor grade J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): 2092 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Arellano, D. P. O'Connor, C. Layne, and M. J. Kurz The independent effect of added mass on the stability of the sagittal plane leg kinematics during steady-state human walking J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1965 - 1970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Daley, A. Voloshina, and A. A. Biewener The role of intrinsic muscle mechanics in the neuromuscular control of stable running in the guinea fowl J. Physiol., June 1, 2009; 587(11): 2693 - 2707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T. Ross and T. R. Nichols Heterogenic Feedback Between Hindlimb Extensors in the Spontaneously Locomoting Premammillary Cat J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 184 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Grimmer, M. Ernst, M. Gunther, and R. Blickhan Running on uneven ground: leg adjustment to vertical steps and self-stability J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2008; 211(18): 2989 - 3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sponberg and R. J. Full Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 433 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]