|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 9, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2795-2800 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007377
Colour perception in a dichromat
1 Department of Cell and Organism Biology, Vision Group, Lund University,
Helgonavägen 3, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
2 Department of Plant Protection Biology, The Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences, Sundsvägen 14, S-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: lina.roth{at}cob.lu.se)
Accepted 6 June 2007
Most mammals have dichromatic colour vision based on two different types of cones: a short-wavelength-sensitive cone and a long-wavelength-sensitive cone. Comparing the signal from two cone types gives rise to a one-dimensional chromatic space when brightness is excluded. The so-called `neutral point' refers to the wavelength that the animal cannot distinguish from achromatic light such as white or grey because it stimulates both cone types equally. The question is: how do dichromats perceive their chromatic space? Do they experience a continuous scale of colours or does the neutral point divide their chromatic space into two colour categories, i.e. into colours of either short or long wavelengths?
We trained horses to different colour combinations in a two-choice behavioural experiment and tested their responses to the training and test colours. The horses chose colours according to their similarity/relationship to rewarded and unrewarded training colours. There was no evidence for a categorical boundary at the neutral point or elsewhere.
This study suggests that dichromats perceive their chromatic space as a continuous scale of colours, treating the colour at the neutral point as any other colour they can distinguish.
Key words: colour vision, dichromat, horse, mammal, chromatic space
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Blackburn DICHROMAT DECISIONS J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2007; 210(16): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||