QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 9, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2767-2780 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.000265

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lauder, G. V. Articles by Madden, P. G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lauder, G. V. Articles by Madden, P. G. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Commentary

Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion

George V. Lauder^1,*, Erik J. Anderson², James Tangorra³ and Peter G. A. Madden¹

¹ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
² Department of Engineering, Grove City College, 100 Campus Drive, Grove City, PA 16127, USA
³ Bioinstrumentation Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: glauder{at}oeb.harvard.edu)

Accepted 25 April 2007

As a result of years of research on the comparative biomechanics and physiology of moving through water, biologists and engineers have made considerable progress in understanding how animals moving underwater use their muscles to power movement, in describing body and appendage motion during propulsion, and in conducting experimental and computational analyses of fluid movement and attendant forces. But it is clear that substantial future progress in understanding aquatic propulsion will require new lines of attack. Recent years have seen the advent of one such new avenue that promises to greatly broaden the scope of intellectual opportunity available to researchers: the use of biorobotic models. In this paper we discuss, using aquatic propulsion in fishes as our focal example, how using robotic models can lead to new insights in the study of aquatic propulsion. We use two examples: (1) pectoral fin function, and (2) hydrodynamic interactions between dorsal and caudal fins. Pectoral fin function is characterized by considerable deformation of individual fin rays, as well as spanwise (along the length) and chordwise (across the fin) deformation and area change. The pectoral fin can generate thrust on both the outstroke and instroke. A robotic model of the pectoral fin replicates this result, and demonstrates the effect of altering stroke kinematics on the pattern of force production. The soft dorsal fin of fishes sheds a distinct vortex wake that dramatically alters incoming flow to the tail: the dorsal fin and caudal fin act as dual flapping foils in series. This design can be replicated with a dual-foil flapping robotic device that demonstrates this phenomenon and allows examination of regions of the flapping performance space not available to fishes. We show how the robotic flapping foil device can also be used to better understand the significance of flexible propulsive surfaces for locomotor performance. Finally we emphasize the utility of self-propelled robotic devices as a means of understanding how locomotor forces are generated, and review different conceptual designs for robotic models of aquatic propulsion.

Key words: fish, swimming, robotics, locomotion, flow visualization, digital particle image velocimetry, kinematics, fin, foil, propulsion

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. T. Richards Kinematics and hydrodynamics analysis of swimming anurans reveals striking inter-specific differences in the mechanism for producing thrust J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2010; 213(4): 621 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Borazjani and F. Sotiropoulos On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2010; 213(1): 89 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Schwenk, D. K. Padilla, G. S. Bakken, and R. J. Full Grand challenges in organismal biology Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 49(1): 7 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Jones, A. S. Jong, and D. J. Ellerby The effects of acute temperature change on swimming performance in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2008; 211(9): 1386 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Bandyopadhyay, D. N. Beal, and A. Menozzi Biorobotic insights into how animals swim J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 206 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Kendall, K. S. Lucey, E. A. Jones, J. Wang, and D. J. Ellerby Mechanical and energetic factors underlying gait transitions in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4265 - 4271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]