QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online July 20, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2637-2648 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.005025

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Windmill, J. F. C. Articles by Robert, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Windmill, J. F. C. Articles by Robert, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mechanics of a `simple' ear: tympanal vibrations in noctuid moths

J. F. C. Windmill^1,*, J. H. Fullard² and D. Robert¹

¹ School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK
² Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 1C6, Canada

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: james.windmill{at}bristol.ac.uk)

Accepted 2 May 2007

Anatomically, the ears of moths are considered to be among the simplest ears found in animals. Microscanning laser vibrometry was used to examine the surface vibrations of the entire tympanal region of the ears of the noctuid moths Agrotis exclamationis, Noctua pronuba, Xestia c-nigrum and Xestia triangulum. During stimulation with ultrasound at intensities known to activate receptor neurones, the tympanum vibrates with maximum deflection amplitudes at the location where the receptor cells attach. In the reportedly heterogeneous tympana of noctuid moths, this attachment site is an opaque zone that is surrounded by a transparent, thinner cuticular region. In response to sound pressure, this region moves relatively little compared with the opaque zone. Thus, the deflections of the moth tympanic membrane are not those of a simple circular drum. The acoustic sensitivity of the ear of N. pronuba, as measured on the attachment site, is 100±14 nm Pa^–1 (N=10), corresponding to tympanal motion of a mere 200 pm at sound pressure levels near the neural threshold.

Key words: bioacoustics, hearing, tympanal membrane, Noctuidae, Lepidoptera

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

GOOD VIBRATIONS

Laura Blackburn
JEB 2007 210: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Lucas, J. F. C. Windmill, D. Robert, and J. E. Yack Auditory mechanics and sensitivity in the tropical butterfly Morpho peleides (Papilionoidea, Nymphalidae) J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 212(21): 3533 - 3541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Montealegre-Z, J. F. C. Windmill, G. K. Morris, and D. Robert Mechanical phase shifters for coherent acoustic radiation in the stridulating wings of crickets: the plectrum mechanism J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2009; 212(2): 257 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.F.C Windmill, S Bockenhauer, and D Robert Time-resolved tympanal mechanics of the locust J R Soc Interface, December 6, 2008; 5(29): 1435 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sueur, J. F. C. Windmill, and D. Robert Sexual dimorphism in auditory mechanics: tympanal vibrations of Cicada orni J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2379 - 2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Blackburn GOOD VIBRATIONS J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): i - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]