spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 15, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2333-2345 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.004457
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodson-Tole, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wakeling, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodson-Tole, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wakeling, J. M.

Variations in motor unit recruitment patterns occur within and between muscles in the running rat (Rattus norvegicus)

E. F. Hodson-Tole* and J. M. Wakeling

The Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: etole{at}rvc.ac.uk)

Accepted 18 April 2007

Motor units are generally considered to follow a set, orderly pattern of recruitment within each muscle with activation occurring in the slowest through to the fastest units. A growing body of evidence, however, suggests that recruitment patterns may not always follow such an orderly sequence. Here we investigate whether motor unit recruitment patterns vary within and between the ankle extensor muscles of the rat running at 40 cm s-1 on a level treadmill. In the past it has been difficult to quantify motor unit recruitment patterns during locomotion; however, recent application of wavelet analysis techniques has made such detailed analysis of motor unit recruitment possible. Here we present methods for quantifying the interplay of fast and slow motor unit recruitment based on their myoelectric signals. Myoelectric data were collected from soleus, plantaris and medial gastrocnemius muscles representing populations of slow, mixed and fast fibres, respectively, and providing a good opportunity to relate myoelectric frequency content to motor unit recruitment patterns. Following wavelet transformation, principal component analysis quantified signal intensity and relative frequency content. Significant differences in signal frequency content occurred between different time points within a stride (P<0.001). We optimised high- and low-frequency wavelets to the major signals from the fast and slow motor units. The goodness-of-fit of the optimised wavelets to the signal intensity was high for all three muscles (r2>0.98). The low-frequency band had a significantly better fit to signals from the soleus muscle (P<0.001), while the high-frequency band had a significantly better fit to the medial gastrocnemius (P<0.001).

Key words: fibre-type, frequency band analysis, muscle, principal component, wavelet, EMG




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
T. J. Roberts and A. M. Gabaldon
Interpreting muscle function from EMG: lessons learned from direct measurements of muscle force
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 18, 2008; (2008) icn056v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. F. Hodson-Tole and J. M. Wakeling
Motor unit recruitment patterns 1: responses to changes in locomotor velocity and incline
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1882 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. F. Hodson-Tole and J. M. Wakeling
Motor unit recruitment patterns 2: the influence of myoelectric intensity and muscle fascicle strain rate
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1893 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. Herrel, V. Schaerlaeken, C. Ross, J. Meyers, K. Nishikawa, V. Abdala, A. Manzano, and P. Aerts
Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: Limitations and insights
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 28, 2008; (2008) icn025v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007