spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 21, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2013-2024 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.001974
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaanholt, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaanholt, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, G. H.

Behavioural and physiological responses to increased foraging effort in male mice

Lobke M. Vaanholt1,*, Berber De Jong1, Theodore Garland, Jr2, Serge Daan1 and G. Henk Visser1,3

1 University of Groningen, Department of Behavioural Biology, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands
2 University of California, Riverside, Department of Biology, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
3 University of Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: l.m.vaanholt{at}rug.nl)

Accepted 13 March 2007

Free-living animals must forage for food and hence may face energetic constraints imposed by their natural environmental conditions (e.g. ambient temperature, food availability). Simulating the variation in such constraints, we have experimentally manipulated the rate of work (wheel running) mice must do to obtain their food, and studied the ensuing behavioural and physiological responses. This was done with a line of mice selectively bred for high spontaneous wheel running and a randomly bred control line that vary in the amount of baseline wheel-running activity. We first determined the maximum workload for each individual. The maximum workload animals could engage in was around 23 km d–1 in both control and activity-selected mice, and was not associated with baseline wheel-running activity. We then kept mice at 90% of their individual maximum and measured several physiological and behavioural traits. At this high workload, mice increased wheel-running activity from an average of 10 to 20 km d–1, and decreased food intake and body mass by approximately 20%. Mass-specific resting metabolic rate strongly decreased from 1.43 to 0.98 kJ g–1 d–1, whereas daily energy expenditure slightly increased from 2.09 to 2.25 kJ g–1 d–1. Costs of running decreased from 2.3 to 1.6 kJ km–1 between baseline and workload conditions. At high workloads, animals were in a negative energy balance, resulting in a sharp reduction in fat mass as well as a slight decrease in dry lean mass. In addition, corticosterone levels increased, and body temperature was extremely low in some animals at high workloads. When challenged to work for food, mice thus show significant physiological and behavioural adjustments.

Key words: mouse, daily energy expenditure, doubly labeled water technique, energy balance, resting metabolic rate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. A. Schubert, L. M. Vaanholt, F. Stavasius, G. E. Demas, S. Daan, and G. H. Visser
Female mice respond differently to costly foraging versus food restriction
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2008; 211(14): 2214 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007