QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 21, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1912-1924 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.002063

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hedrick, T. L. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hedrick, T. L. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Low speed maneuvering flight of the rose-breasted cockatoo (Eolophus roseicapillus). II. Inertial and aerodynamic reorientation

T. L. Hedrick^1,*, J. R. Usherwood² and A. A. Biewener³

¹ Department of Biology, CB 3280 Coker Hall, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
² Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Herts, AL9 7TA, UK
³ Concord Field Station, MCZ, Harvard University, Old Causeway Road, Bedford, MA 01730, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: thedrick{at}bio.unc.edu)

Accepted 6 March 2007

The reconfigurable, flapping wings of birds allow for both inertial and aerodynamic modes of reorientation. We found evidence that both these modes play important roles in the low speed turning flight of the rose-breasted cockatoo Eolophus roseicapillus. Using three-dimensional kinematics recorded from six cockatoos making a 90° turn in a flight corridor, we developed predictions of inertial and aerodynamic reorientation from estimates of wing moments of inertia and flapping arcs, and a blade-element aerodynamic model. The blade-element model successfully predicted weight support (predicted was 88±17% of observed, N=6) and centripetal force (predicted was 79±29% of observed, N=6) for the maneuvering cockatoos and provided a reasonable estimate of mechanical power. The estimated torque from the model was a significant predictor of roll acceleration (r²=0.55, P<0.00001), but greatly overestimated roll magnitude when applied with no roll damping. Non-dimensional roll damping coefficients of approximately –1.5, 2–6 times greater than those typical of airplane flight dynamics (approximately –0.45), were required to bring our estimates of reorientation due to aerodynamic torque back into conjunction with the measured changes in orientation. Our estimates of inertial reorientation were statistically significant predictors of the measured reorientation within wingbeats (r² from 0.2 to 0.37, P<0.0005). Components of both our inertial reorientation and aerodynamic torque estimates correlated, significantly, with asymmetries in the activation profile of four flight muscles: the pectoralis, supracoracoideus, biceps brachii and extensor metacarpi radialis (r² from 0.27 to 0.45, P<0.005). Thus, avian flight maneuvers rely on production of asymmetries throughout the flight apparatus rather than in a specific set of control or turning muscles.

Key words: avian, maneuvering, biomechanics, flight, dynamics, Eolophus roseicapillus

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

CORNERING COCKATOOS

Laura Blackburn
JEB 2007 210: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Iriarte-Diaz and S. M. Swartz Kinematics of slow turn maneuvering in the fruit bat Cynopterus brachyotis J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3478 - 3489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. K. Taylor, M. Bacic, R. J. Bomphrey, A. C. Carruthers, J. Gillies, S. M. Walker, and A. L. R. Thomas New experimental approaches to the biology of flight control systems J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 258 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hesselberg and F.-O. Lehmann Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4319 - 4334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Hedrick and A. A. Biewener Low speed maneuvering flight of the rose-breasted cockatoo (Eolophus roseicapillus). I. Kinematic and neuromuscular control of turning J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1897 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]