QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1804-1812 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02769

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Narendra, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Narendra, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information

Ajay Narendra

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Present address: ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science and Centre for Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Biology Place, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia (e-mail: ajay.narendra{at}anu.edu.au)

Accepted 5 March 2007

Individually foraging ants are known to return to their nest by using path-integration and recording visual information present in the environment. The interaction between the path integrator and the information provided by the visual cues in an Australian desert ant are reported here. Ants were trained to travel in a 1-m wide and 20-m long corridor of cylinders. Homeward paths of trained ants were recorded in the presence and absence of vector information and route cues in both the familiar training field and in an unfamiliar test field. Homing ants used route cue information only in a familiar context. The route cues were not essential but served to reduce the deviation of the homing trajectory from the nest–feeder line. When displaced locally, homebound ants initially oriented towards the nest using distant cues and then headed in a direction intermediate between that dictated by the path integrator and the distant cues. If in the course of travel ants encountered the familiar path they adhered to it. If not, they travelled on average half the distance of the outbound journey and initiated a search directed towards the nest. Following the search, ants headed in a direction intermediate between that dictated by the route cues and the distant cues. In an unfamiliar context neither vector nor route cue information could steer a homing ant towards the nest. The dominance of distant cues, the importance of familiar context and the interaction between different navigation strategies are discussed here.

Key words: distant cues, route cues, path integrator, context, interaction, ants, Melophorus bagoti

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Merkle and R. Wehner Landmark guidance and vector navigation in outbound desert ants J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3370 - 3377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Collett, P. Graham, and R. A. Harris Novel landmark-guided routes in ants J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2025 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Narendra Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti I. Proportional path-integration takes the ant half-way home J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2007; 210(10): 1798 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]