spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1726-1734 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02766
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karasov, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karasov, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Absorption of sugars in the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus): a paradox explained

Christopher R. Tracy1,2,*, Todd J. McWhorter3,4, Carmi Korine1, Michal S. Wojciechowski1,5, Berry Pinshow1 and William H. Karasov3

1 Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990 Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel
2 School of Science, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
3 Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
4 Department of Veterinary Biology & Biomedical Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
5 Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of General and Molecular Biology, Nicolas Copernicus University, Torun, Poland

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: chris.tracy{at}cdu.edu.au)

Accepted 1 March 2007

Two decades ago D. J. Keegan reported results on Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus, Megachiroptera) that were strangely at odds with the prevailing understanding of how glucose is absorbed in the mammalian intestine. Keegan's in vitro tests for glucose transport against a concentration gradient and with phloridzin inhibition in fruit bat intestine were all negative, although he used several different tissue preparations and had positive control results with laboratory rats. Because glucose absorption by fruit bats is nonetheless efficient, Keegan postulated that the rapid glucose absorption from the fruit bat intestine is not through the enterocytes, but must occur via spaces between the cells. Thus, we hypothesized that absorption of water-soluble compounds that are not actively transported would be extensive in these bats, and would decline with increasing molecular mass in accord with sieve-like paracellular absorption. We did not presume from Keegan's studies that there is no Na+-coupled, mediated sugar transport in these bats, and our study was not designed to rule it out, but rather to quantify the level of possible non-mediated absorption. Using a standard pharmacokinetic technique, we fed, or injected intraperitonealy, the metabolically inert carbohydrates L-rhamnose (molecular mass=164 Da) and cellobiose (molecular mass=342 Da), which are absorbed by paracellular uptake, and 3-O-methyl-D-glucose (3OMD-glucose), a D-glucose analog that is absorbed via both mediated (active) and paracellular uptake. As predicted, the bioavailability of paracellular probes declined with increasing molecular mass (rhamnose, 62±4%; cellobiose, 22±4%) and was significantly higher in bats than has been reported for rats and other mammals. In addition, fractional absorption of 3OMD-glucose was high (91±2%). We estimated that Egyptian fruit bats rely on passive, paracellular absorption for the majority of their glucose absorption (at least 55% of 3OMD-glucose absorption), much more than in non-flying mammals.

Key words: paracellular nutrient uptake, carbohydrate absorption, Chiroptera, Egyptian fruit bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. R. Napier, T. J. McWhorter, and P. A. Fleming
Mechanism and rate of glucose absorption differ between an Australian honeyeater (Meliphagidae) and a lorikeet (Loriidae)
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2008; 211(22): 3544 - 3553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
K. R Napier, C. Purchase, T. J McWhorter, S. W Nicolson, and P. A Fleming
The sweet life: diet sugar concentration influences paracellular glucose absorption
Biol Lett, October 23, 2008; 4(5): 530 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. C. Welch Jr, L. G. Herrera M., and R. K. Suarez
Dietary sugar as a direct fuel for flight in the nectarivorous bat Glossophaga soricina
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Caviedes-Vidal, T. J. McWhorter, S. R. Lavin, J. G. Chediack, C. R. Tracy, and W. H. Karasov
The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: High intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts
PNAS, November 27, 2007; 104(48): 19132 - 19137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007