QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online April 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1757-1764 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02189

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Deily, J. A. Articles by Schul, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Deily, J. A. Articles by Schul, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Spectral selectivity during phonotaxis: a comparative study in Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)

Joshua A. Deily^* and Johannes Schul

Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jadz67{at}mizzou.edu)

Accepted 28 February 2006

The calls of male Neoconocephalus have most energy concentrated in a relatively narrow low-frequency band. In N. robustus this low-frequency band is centered around 7 kHz, whereas calls of N. nebrascensis and N. bivocatus have center frequencies close to 10 kHz. The importance of the position of the low-frequency band for female phonotaxis in these three species was determined using a walking compensator. Female N. robustus showed significant phonotaxis towards call frequencies from 5 to 10 kHz, and spectral selectivity towards higher frequencies did not change with stimulus amplitude. Significant responses in N. nebrascensis and N. bivocatus occurred at significantly higher frequency ranges than in N. robustus. In these species, spectral selectivity changed with stimulus amplitude; at 68 dB sound pressure level (SPL), upper cut-off frequency was significantly lower than at 80 dB SPL in both species. Adding a higher harmonic to the conspecific carrier frequency had a strong inhibitory effect on phonotaxis in N. robustus: at higher relative amplitudes of the harmonic, phonotaxis was completely suppressed. Adding a higher harmonic to the conspecific carrier frequency had a much weaker but significant inhibitory effect in N. nebrascensis and little, if any, effect in N. bivocatus. The processing of song spectrum in the sensory system is discussed with regard to the differences in spectral selectivity among the three species. The sharp spectral selectivity of N. robustus is interpreted as an adaptation for species isolation.

Key words: acoustic communication, spectral processing, carrier frequency, call recognition, hearing, phonotaxis, Neoconocephalus

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Triblehorn and J. Schul Sensory-Encoding Differences Contribute to Species-Specific Call Recognition Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1348 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]