|
| ![]() |
|
||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online April 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1585-1593 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02169
The role of mechanosensory input in flower handling efficiency and learning by Manduca sexta
Department of Biological Sciences, Coker Life Sciences Building, 700 Sumter Street, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jgoyret{at}biol.sc.edu)
Accepted 13 February 2006
Nectar-foraging animals are known to utilize nectar guides patterns of visual contrast in flowers to find hidden nectar. However, few studies have explored the potential for mechanosensory cues to function as nectar guides, particularly for nocturnal pollinators such as the tobacco hornworm moth, Manduca sexta. We used arrays of artificial flowers to investigate the flower handling behavior (the ability to locate and drink from floral nectaries) of naïve moths, looking specifically at: (1) how the shape and size of flat (two-dimensional) artificial corollas affect nectar discovery and (2) whether three-dimensional features of the corolla can be used to facilitate nectar discovery. In these experiments, we decoupled visual from tactile flower features to explore the role of mechanosensory input, putatively attained via the extended proboscides of hovering moths. In addition, we examined changes in nectar discovery times within single foraging bouts to test whether moths can learn to handle different kinds of artificial flowers. We found that corolla surface area negatively affects flower handling efficiency, and that reliable mechanosensory input is crucial for the moths' performance. We also found that three-dimensional features of the corolla, such as grooves, can significantly affect the foraging behavior, both positively (when grooves converge to the nectary) and negatively (when grooves are unnaturally oriented). Lastly, we observed that moths can decrease nectar discovery time during a single foraging bout. This apparent learning ability seems to be possible only when reliable mechanosensory input is available.
Key words: pollination, Lepidoptera, sensory, multimodal, Sphingidae
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Goyret, A. Kelber, M. Pfaff, and R. A. Raguso Flexible responses to visual and olfactory stimuli by foraging Manduca sexta: larval nutrition affects adult behaviour Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2009; 276(1668): 2739 - 2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Goyret, P. M. Markwell, and R. A. Raguso Chemical Ecology Special Feature: Context- and scale-dependent effects of floral CO2 on nectar foraging by Manduca sexta PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4565 - 4570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Goyret, P. M. Markwell, and R. A. Raguso The effect of decoupling olfactory and visual stimuli on the foraging behavior of Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1398 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Martins and S. D. Johnson Hawkmoth pollination of aerangoid orchids in Kenya, with special reference to nectar sugar concentration gradients in the floral spurs Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2007; 94(4): 650 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. H. Sprayberry and T. L. Daniel Flower tracking in hawkmoths: behavior and energetics J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2007; 210(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Seidl and R. Wehner Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3336 - 3344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Phillips PROBING PROBOSCIS LEADS MOTH TO NECTAR J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||