QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 17, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1251-1260 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02127

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kern, R. Articles by Egelhaaf, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kern, R. Articles by Egelhaaf, M.

Representation of behaviourally relevant information by blowfly motion-sensitive visual interneurons requires precise compensatory head movements

R. Kern^1,*, J. H. van Hateren² and M. Egelhaaf¹

¹ Department of Neurobiology, Faculty for Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33501, Germany
² Department of Neurobiophysics, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: roland.kern{at}uni-bielefeld.de)

Accepted 26 January 2006

Flying blowflies shift their gaze by saccadic turns of body and head, keeping their gaze basically fixed between saccades. For the head, this results in almost pure translational optic flow between saccades, enabling visual interneurons in the fly motion pathway to extract information about translation of the animal and thereby about the spatial layout of the environment. There are noticeable differences between head and body movements during flight. Head saccades are faster and shorter than body saccades, and the head orientation is more stable between saccades than the body orientation. Here, we analyse the functional importance of these differences by probing visual interneurons of the blowfly motion pathway with optic flow based on either head movements or body movements, as recorded accurately with a magnetic search coil technique. We find that the precise head–body coordination is essential for the visual system to separate the translational from the rotational optic flow. If the head were tightly coupled to the body, the resulting optic flow would not contain the behaviourally important information on translation. Since it is difficult to resolve head orientation in many experimental paradigms, even when employing state-of-the-art digital video techniques, we introduce a `headifying algorithm', which transforms the time-dependent body orientation in free flight into an estimate of head orientation. We show that application of this algorithm leads to an estimated head orientation between saccades that is sufficiently stable to enable recovering information on translation. The algorithm may therefore be of practical use when head orientation is needed but cannot be measured.

Key words: optic flow, motion sensitive neuron, eye movement, blowfly, Calliphora vicina

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F.-O. Lehmann When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake wing interference in insect wings J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 224 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Paulk and C. Gilbert Proprioceptive encoding of head position in the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens (L.) (Stratiomyidae) J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2006; 209(19): 3913 - 3924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]