|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online February 15, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 826-833 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02069
Taste discrimination in conditioned taste aversion of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis
1 Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido
University, North 10, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
2 Laboratory of Functional Biology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at
Kagawa Campus, Tokushima Bunri University, 1314-1 Shido, Sanuki 769-2193,
Japan
3 Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University,
South 1, West 17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
4 Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N
4N1, Canada
5 Division of Innovative Research, Creative Research Initiative
"Sousei" (CRIS), Hokkaido University, North 21, West 10, Kita-ku,
Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: eito{at}sci.hokudai.ac.jp)
Accepted 3 January 2006
Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis has been widely used as a model for gaining an understanding of the molecular and behavioral mechanisms underlying learning and memory. At the behavioral level, however, it is still unclear how taste discrimination and CTA interact. We thus examined how CTA to one taste affected the feeding response induced by another appetitive food stimulus. We first demonstrated that snails have the capacity to recognize sucrose and carrot juice as distinct appetitive stimuli. We then found that snails can become conditioned (i.e. CTA) to avoid one of the stimuli and not the other. These results show that snails can distinguish between appetitive stimuli during CTA, suggesting that taste discrimination is processed upstream of the site where memory consolidation in the snail brain occurs. Moreover, we examined second-order conditioning with two appetitive stimuli and one aversive stimulus. Snails acquired second-order conditioning and were still able to distinguish between the different stimuli. Finally, we repeatedly presented the conditional stimulus alone to the conditioned snails, but this procedure did not extinguish the long-term memory of CTA in the snails. Taken together, our data suggest that CTA causes specific, irreversible and rigid changes from appetitive stimuli to aversive ones in the conditioning procedure.
Key words: conditioned taste aversion, long-term memory, Lymnaea stagnalis, second-order conditioning, taste discrimination
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. V. Orr and K. Lukowiak Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence Demonstrating That Predator Detection Alters Adaptive Behaviors in the Snail Lymnaea J. Neurosci., March 12, 2008; 28(11): 2726 - 2734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Orr, M. El-Bekai, M. Lui, K. Watson, and K. Lukowiak Predator detection in Lymnaea stagnalis J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 210(23): 4150 - 4158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sugai, S. Azami, H. Shiga, T. Watanabe, H. Sadamoto, S. Kobayashi, D. Hatakeyama, Y. Fujito, K. Lukowiak, and E. Ito One-trial conditioned taste aversion in Lymnaea: good and poor performers in long-term memory acquisition J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): 1225 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||