spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 31, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 622-632 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02010
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutmann, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bertram, J. E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutmann, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bertram, J. E. A.

Constrained optimization in human running

Anne K. Gutmann1, Brian Jacobi2, Michael T. Butcher3 and John E. A. Bertram4,*

1 Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 12853, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary
4 Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jbertram{at}ucalgary.ca)

Accepted 21 November 2005

Walking humans spontaneously select different speed, frequency and step length combinations, depending on which of these three parameters is specified. This behavior can be explained by constrained optimization of cost of transport (metabolic cost/distance) where cost of transport is seen as the main component of an underlying objective function that is minimized within the limitations of specified constraints. It is then of interest to ask whether or not such results are specific to walking only, or indicate a more general feature of locomotion control. The current study examines running gait selection within the framework of constrained optimization by comparing self-selected running gaits to the gaits predicted by constrained optimization of a cost surface constructed from cost data available in the literature. Normalizing speed and frequency values in the behavioral data by preferred speed and frequency reduced inter-subject variability and made group behavioral trends more visible. Although actual behavior did not coincide exactly with running cost optimization, self-selected gait and predictions from the general human cost surface did agree to within the 95% confidence interval and the region of minimal cost+0.005 ml O2 kg-1 m-1. This was similar to the level of agreement between actual and predicted behavior observed in walking. Thus, there seems to be substantial evidence to suggest that (i) selection of gait parameters in running can largely be predicted using constrained optimization, and (ii) general cost surfaces can be constructed using metabolic data from one group that will largely predict the behavior of other groups.

Key words: gait, locomotion, cost, control, human


Related articles in JEB:

MINIMISING THE COST TO GET BY

JEB 2006 209: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
MINIMISING THE COST TO GET BY
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2006; 209(4): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006