|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online December 1, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 4901-4907 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02593
Mechanics of nectar feeding in the orchid bee Euglossa imperialis: pressure, viscosity and flow
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA
e-mail: bborrell{at}cal.berkeley.edu
Accepted 16 October 2006
The orchid bee Euglossa imperialis sucks nectars through a slender proboscis. I tested how nectar properties influence this suction pressure and whether ambient air pressure sets the upper limit for suction feeding. Nectar intake rate was measured as a function of sucrose concentration (5-75% w/w), nectar viscosity (2-80 mPa s), and ambient pressure (101-40 kPa). Intake rate declines from about 1.2 µl s-1 to 0.003 µl s-1 as sucrose concentration increases from 15% to 65% sucrose. When sucrose concentration is held at 25% while viscosity increases from 2 to 80 mPa s, intake rate declines. When viscosity is held at 10.2 mPa s (the viscosity of 50% sucrose) while sucrose concentration increases from 5% to 50%, intake rate remains constant. Intake rate was limited by a reduction in ambient pressure at all nectar concentrations. Assuming a rigid proboscis, the Hagen-Poiseuille equation suggests that suction pressure increases with viscosity from 10 kPa at 5% sucrose to 45 kPa at 65% sucrose. However, because intake rate declined by the same fraction under hypobaria (40 kPa) at all sucrose concentrations, the euglossine bee proboscis may be better described as a collapsible tube: expanding or collapsing depending on the flow rate, the pressure gradient along the proboscis, and circumferential forces imposed by the proboscis walls.
Key words: Apidae, Euglossini, foraging, energetics, biomechanics, tongue
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Blackburn WHEN THE PRESSURE DROPS, BEES SUCK J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||