|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online October 5, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3990-3999 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02471
Joint work and power for both the forelimb and hindlimb during trotting in the horse
1 School of Physical Education and Health, Eastern Oregon University, La
Grande, OR 97850, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona, CA, USA
3 College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing,
MI, USA
4 Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona, CA, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ddutto{at}eou.edu)
Accepted 7 August 2006
The net work of the limbs during constant speed over level ground should be zero. However, the partitioning of negative and positive work between the fore- and hindlimbs of a quadruped is not likely to be equal because the forelimb produces a net braking force while the hindlimb produces a net propulsive force. It was hypothesized that the forelimb would do net negative work while the hindlimb did net positive work during trotting in the horse. Because vertical and horizontal impulses remain unchanged across speeds it was hypothesized that net work of both limbs would be independent of speed. Additionally because the major mass of limb musculature is located proximally, it was hypothesized that proximal joints would do more work than distal joints. Kinetic and kinematic analysis were combined using inverse dynamics to calculate work and power for each joint of horses trotting at between 2.5 and 5.0 m s–1.
Work done by the hindlimb was indeed positive (consistently 0.34 J kg–1 across all speeds), but, contrary to our hypothesis, net work by the forelimb was essentially zero (but also independent of trotting speed). The zero net work of the forelimb may be the consequence of our not being able to account, experimentally, for the negative work done by the extrinsic muscles connecting the scapula and the thorax. The distal three joints of both limbs behaved elastically with a period of energy absorption followed by energy return. Proximal forelimb joints (elbow and shoulder) did no net work, because there was very little movement of the elbow and shoulder during the portion of stance when an extensor moment was greatest. Of the two proximal hindlimb joints, the hip did positive work during the stride, generating energy almost throughout stance. The knee did some work, but like the forelimb proximal joints, had little movement during the middle of stance when the flexion moment was the greatest, probably serving to allow the efficient transmission of energy from the hip musculature to the ground.
Key words: equine, locomotion, joint kinetics, angular kinematics, work, power
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. T. Richards The kinematic determinants of anuran swimming performance: an inverse and forward dynamics approach J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2008; 211(19): 3181 - 3194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Ren, M. Butler, C. Miller, H. Paxton, D. Schwerda, M. S. Fischer, and J. R. Hutchinson The movements of limb segments and joints during locomotion in African and Asian elephants J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 211(17): 2735 - 2751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. DeVita, J. Helseth, and T. Hortobagyi Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3361 - 3373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Bobbert, C. B. G. Alvarez, P. R. van Weeren, L. Roepstorff, and M. A. Weishaupt Validation of vertical ground reaction forces on individual limbs calculated from kinematics of horse locomotion J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1885 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
