QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 5, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3953-3963 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02455

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Adamczyk, P. G. Articles by Kuo, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Adamczyk, P. G. Articles by Kuo, A. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking

Peter G. Adamczyk^*, Steven H. Collins and Arthur D. Kuo

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: padamczy{at}umich.edu)

Accepted 24 July 2006

The plantigrade human foot rolls over the ground during each walking step, roughly analogous to a wheel. The center of pressure progresses on the ground like a wheel of radius 0.3 L (leg length). We examined the effect of varying foot curvature on the mechanics and energetics of walking. We controlled curvature by attaching rigid arc shapes of various radii to the bottoms of rigid boots restricting ankle motion. We measured mechanical work performed on the center of mass (COM), and net metabolic rate, in human subjects (N=10) walking with seven arc radii from 0.02–0.40 m. Simple models of dynamic walking predict that redirection of COM velocity requires step-to-step transition work, decreasing quadratically with arc radius. Metabolic cost would be expected to change in proportion to mechanical work. We measured the average rate of negative work performed on the COM, and found that it followed the trend well (r²=0.95), with 2.37 times as much work for small radii as for large. Net metabolic rate (subtracting quiet standing) also decreased with increasing arc radius to a minimum at 0.3 L, with a slight increase thereafter. Maximum net metabolic rate was 6.25 W kg^–1 (for small-radius arc feet), about 59% greater than the minimum rate of 3.93 W kg^–1, which in turn was about 45% greater than the rate in normal walking. Metabolic rate was fit reasonably well (r²=0.86) by a quadratic curve, but exceeded that expected from COM work for extreme arc sizes. Other factors appear to increase metabolic cost for walking on very small and very large arc feet. These factors may include effort expended to stabilize the joints (especially the knee) or to maintain balance. Rolling feet with curvature 0.3 L appear energetically advantageous for plantigrade walking, partially due to decreased work for step-to-step transitions.

Key words: metabolic energy, locomotion, biomechanics, rocker bottom

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.C. Dean and A.D. Kuo Elastic coupling of limb joints enables faster bipedal walking J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2009; 6(35): 561 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Wei, T. M. H. Dijkstra, and D. Sternad Stability and Variability: Indicators for Passive Stability and Active Control in a Rhythmic Task J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 3027 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]