|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online January 3, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 260-272 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01980
Dynamics of geckos running vertically

1 Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219-7899,
USA
2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA
94720-3140, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
rjfull{at}berkeley.edu)
Accepted 9 November 2005
Geckos with adhesive toe pads rapidly climb even smooth vertical surfaces. We challenged geckos (Hemidactylus garnotii) to climb up a smooth vertical track that contained a force platform. Geckos climbed vertically at up to 77 cm s-1 with a stride frequency of 15 Hz using a trotting gait. During each step, whole body foreaft, lateral and normal forces all decreased to zero when the animal attached or detached its toe pads. Peak foreaft force was twice body weight at mid-step. Geckos climbed at a constant average velocity without generating decelerating forces on their center of mass in the direction of motion. Although mass-specific mechanical power to climb was ten times the value expected for level running, the total mechanical energy of climbing was only 511% greater than the potential energy change. Fore- and hindlegs both pulled toward the midline, possibly loading the attachment mechanisms. Attachment and detachment of feet occupied 13% and 37% of stance time, respectively. As climbing speed increased, the absolute time required to attach and detach did not decrease, suggesting that the period of foreaft force production might be constrained. During ascent, the forelegs pulled toward, while hindlegs pushed away from the vertical surface, generating a net pitching moment toward the surface to counterbalance pitch-back away from the surface. Differential leg function appears essential for effective vertical as well as horizontal locomotion.
Key words: locomotion, dynamics, climbing, leg function, mechanical stability, power, gecko, Hemidactylus garnotii
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. Clemente, J. M. R. Bullock, A. Beale, and W. Federle Evidence for self-cleaning in fluid-based smooth and hairy adhesive systems of insects J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2010; 213(4): 635 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, S. Sponberg, A. Parness, N. Esparza, D. Soto, T. Yamaguchi, M. Broide, M. Cutkosky, C. Creton, et al. Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae J R Soc Interface, February 6, 2010; 7(43): 259 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Parness, D. Soto, N. Esparza, N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, K. Autumn, and M. Cutkosky A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime J R Soc Interface, December 6, 2009; 6(41): 1223 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Russell and T. E. Higham A new angle on clinging in geckos: incline, not substrate, triggers the deployment of the adhesive system Proc R Soc B, October 22, 2009; 276(1673): 3705 - 3709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. R. Bullock and W. Federle Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1876 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chen, P. Wu, and H. Gao Pre-tension generates strongly reversible adhesion of a spatula pad on substrate J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2009; 6(35): 529 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. van Griethuijsen and B. A. Trimmer Kinematics of horizontal and vertical caterpillar crawling J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2009; 212(10): 1455 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. DeSilva Functional morphology of the ankle and the likelihood of climbing in early hominins PNAS, April 21, 2009; 106(16): 6567 - 6572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Daltorio, T. E. Wei, A. D. Horchler, L. Southard, G. D. Wile, R. D. Quinn, S. N. Gorb, and R. E. Ritzmann Mini-Whegs TM Climbs Steep Surfaces Using Insect-inspired Attachment Mechanisms The International Journal of Robotics Research, February 1, 2009; 28(2): 285 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. R. Bullock, P. Drechsler, and W. Federle Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2008; 211(20): 3333 - 3343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Chen, P.D Wu, and H Gao Hierarchical modelling of attachment and detachment mechanisms of gecko toe adhesion Proc R Soc A, June 8, 2008; 464(2094): 1639 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J Clemente and W. Federle Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2008; 275(1640): 1329 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Autumn and N. Gravish Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology Phil Trans R Soc A, May 13, 2008; 366(1870): 1575 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jusufi, D. I. Goldman, S. Revzen, and R. J. Full From the Cover: Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4215 - 4219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, and K. Autumn Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment J R Soc Interface, March 6, 2008; 5(20): 339 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Peattie and R. J. Full Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18595 - 18600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 16 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tian, N. Pesika, H. Zeng, K. Rosenberg, B. Zhao, P. McGuiggan, K. Autumn, and J. Israelachvili Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19320 - 19325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Autumn, C. Majidi, R. E. Groff, A. Dittmore, and R. Fearing Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3558 - 3568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Autumn, A. Dittmore, D. Santos, M. Spenko, and M. Cutkosky Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3569 - 3579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Goldman, T. S. Chen, D. M. Dudek, and R. J. Full Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2990 - 3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Phillips DRIVING GECKOS UP THE WALL J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||