|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online January 3, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 260-272 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01980
Dynamics of geckos running vertically
1 Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219-7899,
USA
2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA
94720-3140, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
rjfull{at}berkeley.edu)
Accepted 9 November 2005
Geckos with adhesive toe pads rapidly climb even smooth vertical surfaces. We challenged geckos (Hemidactylus garnotii) to climb up a smooth vertical track that contained a force platform. Geckos climbed vertically at up to 77 cm s-1 with a stride frequency of 15 Hz using a trotting gait. During each step, whole body fore–aft, lateral and normal forces all decreased to zero when the animal attached or detached its toe pads. Peak fore–aft force was twice body weight at mid-step. Geckos climbed at a constant average velocity without generating decelerating forces on their center of mass in the direction of motion. Although mass-specific mechanical power to climb was ten times the value expected for level running, the total mechanical energy of climbing was only 5–11% greater than the potential energy change. Fore- and hindlegs both pulled toward the midline, possibly loading the attachment mechanisms. Attachment and detachment of feet occupied 13% and 37% of stance time, respectively. As climbing speed increased, the absolute time required to attach and detach did not decrease, suggesting that the period of fore–aft force production might be constrained. During ascent, the forelegs pulled toward, while hindlegs pushed away from the vertical surface, generating a net pitching moment toward the surface to counterbalance pitch-back away from the surface. Differential leg function appears essential for effective vertical as well as horizontal locomotion.
Key words: locomotion, dynamics, climbing, leg function, mechanical stability, power, gecko, Hemidactylus garnotii
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Jusufi, D. I. Goldman, S. Revzen, and R. J. Full From the Cover: Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4215 - 4219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Peattie and R. J. Full Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18595 - 18600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 16 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Tian, N. Pesika, H. Zeng, K. Rosenberg, B. Zhao, P. McGuiggan, K. Autumn, and J. Israelachvili Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19320 - 19325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Autumn, C. Majidi, R. E. Groff, A. Dittmore, and R. Fearing Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3558 - 3568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Autumn, A. Dittmore, D. Santos, M. Spenko, and M. Cutkosky Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3569 - 3579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. I. Goldman, T. S. Chen, D. M. Dudek, and R. J. Full Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2990 - 3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Phillips DRIVING GECKOS UP THE WALL J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
