|
| ![]() |
|
||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online September 19, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3786-3794 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02447
Tests of absolute photorefractoriness in four species of cardueline finch that differ in reproductive schedule
1 Departments of Psychology and Biology, University of Western Ontario,
London ON, N6A 5C2, Canada
2 Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, USA
3 Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, Animal Communication
Laboratory, University of California, Davis, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: smacdou2{at}uwo.ca)
Accepted 18 July 2006
Species with different reproductive schedules may differ in how they respond to the annual change in photoperiod (the adaptive specialization hypothesis). Seasonally breeding species are predicted to use photorefractoriness to terminate reproduction prior to inclement conditions in autumn and winter, whereas opportunistically breeding species may not exhibit photorefractoriness. We tested for absolute photorefractoriness in four species of cardueline finch that differ in their reproductive schedules: opportunistically breeding red crossbills, flexibly breeding pine siskins, and seasonally breeding Cassin's finches and gray-crowned rosy-finches. Field observations indicated that all four species regress their gonads and begin prebasic feather molt in late summer or autumn. However, exposure to a long day photoperiod in autumn (24 h:0 h L:D) resulted in elevation of gonadotropins and testicular recrudescence in all species except Cassin's finches. Thus, by this criterion, some of the seasonally breeding species tested here did not exhibit absolute photorefractoriness. These results indicate that phylogenetic history needs to be taken into account when considering the adaptive nature of photoperiod response systems.
Key words: photoperiod, reproduction, Loxia curvirostra, Carduelis pinus, Carpodacus cassinii, Leucosticte tephrocotis
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. MacDougall-Shackleton, T. J. Stevenson, H. E. Watts, M. E. Pereyra, and T. P. Hahn The evolution of photoperiod response systems and seasonal GnRH plasticity in birds Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 49(5): 580 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dawson Control of the annual cycle in birds: endocrine constraints and plasticity in response to ecological variability Phil Trans R Soc B, May 12, 2008; 363(1497): 1621 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Small, P. J. Sharp, G. E. Bentley, and P. Deviche Relative Photorefractoriness, Prolactin, and Reproductive Regression in a Flexibly Breeding Sonoran Desert Passerine, the Rufous-Winged Sparrow, Aimophila carpalis J Biol Rhythms, February 1, 2008; 23(1): 69 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Voigt, W. Goymann, and S. Leitner Green Matters! Growing Vegetation Stimulates Breeding under Short-Day Conditions in Wild Canaries (Serinus canaria) J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 554 - 557. [PDF] |
||||