|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 30, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3569-3579 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02486
Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment
1 Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, 0615 SW Palatine Hill
Road, Portland, OR 97219, USA and
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Building 530,
440 Panama Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-3030, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: autumn{at}lclark.edu)
Accepted 11 August 2006
Directional arrays of branched microscopic setae constitute a dry adhesive on the toes of pad-bearing geckos, nature's supreme climbers. Geckos are easily and rapidly able to detach their toes as they climb. There are two known mechanisms of detachment: (1) on the microscale, the seta detaches when the shaft reaches a critical angle with the substrate, and (2) on the macroscale, geckos hyperextend their toes, apparently peeling like tape. This raises the question of how geckos prevent detachment while inverted on the ceiling, where body weight should cause toes to peel and setal angles to increase. Geckos use opposing feet and toes while inverted, possibly to maintain shear forces that prevent detachment of setae or peeling of toes. If detachment occurs by macroscale peeling of toes, the peel angle should monotonically decrease with applied force. In contrast, if adhesive force is limited by microscale detachment of setae at a critical angle, the toe detachment angle should be independent of applied force. We tested the hypothesis that adhesion is increased by shear force in isolated setal arrays and live gecko toes. We also tested the corollary hypotheses that (1) adhesion in toes and arrays is limited as on the microscale by a critical angle, or (2) on the macroscale by adhesive strength as predicted for adhesive tapes. We found that adhesion depended directly on shear force, and was independent of detachment angle. Therefore we reject the hypothesis that gecko toes peel like tape. The linear relation between adhesion and shear force is consistent with a critical angle of release in live gecko toes and isolated setal arrays, and also with our prior observations of single setae. We introduced a new model, frictional adhesion, for gecko pad attachment and compared it to existing models of adhesive contacts. In an analysis of clinging stability of a gecko on an inclined plane each adhesive model predicted a different force control strategy. The frictional adhesion model provides an explanation for the very low detachment forces observed in climbing geckos that does not depend on toe peeling.
Key words: gecko, adhesion, friction, tribology, contact mechanics, biomechanics, robotic
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Parness, D. Soto, N. Esparza, N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, K. Autumn, and M. Cutkosky A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime J R Soc Interface, December 6, 2009; 6(41): 1223 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. Russell and T. E. Higham A new angle on clinging in geckos: incline, not substrate, triggers the deployment of the adhesive system Proc R Soc B, October 22, 2009; 276(1673): 3705 - 3709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-H. Dirks, C. J. Clemente, and W. Federle Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping J R Soc Interface, September 15, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0308v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. R. Bullock and W. Federle Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1876 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Chen, P. Wu, and H. Gao Pre-tension generates strongly reversible adhesion of a spatula pad on substrate J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2009; 6(35): 529 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, S. Sponberg, A. Parness, N. Esparza, D. Soto, T. Yamaguchi, M. Broide, M. Cutkosky, C. Creton, et al. Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae J R Soc Interface, June 3, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0133v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Lammers Mechanics of generating friction during locomotion on rough and smooth arboreal trackways J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2009; 212(8): 1163 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. E. Jeong, J.-K. Lee, H. N. Kim, S. H. Moon, and K. Y. Suh A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5639 - 5644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Scholz, W. J. P. Barnes, J. M. Smith, and W. Baumgartner Ultrastructure and physical properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea White J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2009; 212(2): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. R. Bullock, P. Drechsler, and W. Federle Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2008; 211(20): 3333 - 3343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lee, C. Majidi, B. Schubert, and R. S Fearing Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2008; 5(25): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Schubert, J. Lee, C. Majidi, and R. S Fearing Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. II. Microscale behaviour J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2008; 5(25): 845 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Varenberg and S Gorb Close-up of mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure: contact element behaviour J R Soc Interface, July 6, 2008; 5(24): 785 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B Chen, P.D Wu, and H Gao Hierarchical modelling of attachment and detachment mechanisms of gecko toe adhesion Proc R Soc A, June 8, 2008; 464(2094): 1639 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J Clemente and W. Federle Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2008; 275(1640): 1329 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Autumn and N. Gravish Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology Phil Trans R Soc A, May 13, 2008; 366(1870): 1575 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, and K. Autumn Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment J R Soc Interface, March 6, 2008; 5(20): 339 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Cover: A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive PNAS, February 19, 2008; 105(7): 2307 - 2312.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Peattie and R. J. Full Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18595 - 18600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Varenberg and S Gorb Shearing of fibrillar adhesive microstructure: friction and shear-related changes in pull-off force J R Soc Interface, August 22, 2007; 4(15): 721 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
