|
| ![]() |
|
||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 30, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3558-3568 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02469
Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays

1 Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219,
USA
2 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of
California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: autumn{at}lclark.edu)
Accepted 5 June 2006
Conventional pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) are fabricated from soft viscoelastic materials that satisfy Dahlquist's criterion for tack with a Young's modulus (E) of 100 kPa or less at room temperature and 1 Hz. In contrast, the adhesive on the toes of geckos is made of ß-keratin, a stiff material with E at least four orders of magnitude greater than the upper limit of Dahlquist's criterion. Therefore, one would not expect a ß-keratin structure to function as a PSA by deforming readily to make intimate molecular contact with a variety of surface profiles. However, since the gecko adhesive is a microstructure in the form of an array of millions of high aspect ratio shafts (setae), the effective elastic modulus (Eeff) is much lower than E of bulk ß-keratin. In the first test of the Eeff of a gecko setal adhesive, we measured the forces resulting from deformation of isolated arrays of tokay gecko (Gekko gecko) setae during vertical compression, and during tangential compression at angles of +45° and -45°. We tested the hypothesis that Eeff of gecko setae falls within Dahlquist's criterion for tack, and evaluated the validity of a model of setae as cantilever beams. Highly linear forces of deformation under all compression conditions support the cantilever model. Eeff of setal arrays during vertical and +45° compression (along the natural path of drag of the setae) were 83±4.0 kPa and 86±4.4 kPa (means ± s.e.m.), respectively. Consistent with the predictions of the cantilever model, setae became significantly stiffer when compressed against the natural path of drag: Eeff during -45° compression was 110±4.7 kPa. Unlike synthetic PSAs, setal arrays act as Hookean elastic solids; setal arrays function as a bed of springs with a directional stiffness, assisting alignment of the adhesive spatular tips with the contact surface during shear loading.
Key words: gecko, adhesion, pressure sensitive adhesive, material science, contact mechanics, biomechanics
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Parness, D. Soto, N. Esparza, N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, K. Autumn, and M. Cutkosky A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime J R Soc Interface, December 6, 2009; 6(41): 1223 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. R. Bullock and W. Federle Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1876 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, S. Sponberg, A. Parness, N. Esparza, D. Soto, T. Yamaguchi, M. Broide, M. Cutkosky, C. Creton, et al. Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae J R Soc Interface, June 3, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0133v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Jeong, J.-K. Lee, H. N. Kim, S. H. Moon, and K. Y. Suh A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5639 - 5644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lee, C. Majidi, B. Schubert, and R. S Fearing Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2008; 5(25): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Schubert, J. Lee, C. Majidi, and R. S Fearing Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. II. Microscale behaviour J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2008; 5(25): 845 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Autumn and N. Gravish Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology Phil Trans R Soc A, May 13, 2008; 366(1870): 1575 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, and K. Autumn Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment J R Soc Interface, March 6, 2008; 5(20): 339 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M Peattie, C. Majidi, A. Corder, and R. J Full Ancestrally high elastic modulus of gecko setal {beta}-keratin J R Soc Interface, December 22, 2007; 4(17): 1071 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Peattie and R. J. Full Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18595 - 18600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Autumn, A. Dittmore, D. Santos, M. Spenko, and M. Cutkosky Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3569 - 3579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||