QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 30, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3558-3568 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02469

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Autumn, K. Articles by Fearing, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Autumn, K. Articles by Fearing, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays

K. Autumn^1,*, C. Majidi², R. E. Groff^2,, A. Dittmore¹ and R. Fearing²

¹ Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219, USA
² Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: autumn{at}lclark.edu)

Accepted 5 June 2006

Conventional pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) are fabricated from soft viscoelastic materials that satisfy Dahlquist's criterion for tack with a Young's modulus (E) of 100 kPa or less at room temperature and 1 Hz. In contrast, the adhesive on the toes of geckos is made of ß-keratin, a stiff material with E at least four orders of magnitude greater than the upper limit of Dahlquist's criterion. Therefore, one would not expect a ß-keratin structure to function as a PSA by deforming readily to make intimate molecular contact with a variety of surface profiles. However, since the gecko adhesive is a microstructure in the form of an array of millions of high aspect ratio shafts (setae), the effective elastic modulus (E_eff) is much lower than E of bulk ß-keratin. In the first test of the E_eff of a gecko setal adhesive, we measured the forces resulting from deformation of isolated arrays of tokay gecko (Gekko gecko) setae during vertical compression, and during tangential compression at angles of +45° and -45°. We tested the hypothesis that E_eff of gecko setae falls within Dahlquist's criterion for tack, and evaluated the validity of a model of setae as cantilever beams. Highly linear forces of deformation under all compression conditions support the cantilever model. E_eff of setal arrays during vertical and +45° compression (along the natural path of drag of the setae) were 83±4.0 kPa and 86±4.4 kPa (means ± s.e.m.), respectively. Consistent with the predictions of the cantilever model, setae became significantly stiffer when compressed against the natural path of drag: E_eff during -45° compression was 110±4.7 kPa. Unlike synthetic PSAs, setal arrays act as Hookean elastic solids; setal arrays function as a bed of springs with a directional stiffness, assisting alignment of the adhesive spatular tips with the contact surface during shear loading.

Key words: gecko, adhesion, pressure sensitive adhesive, material science, contact mechanics, biomechanics

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Parness, D. Soto, N. Esparza, N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, K. Autumn, and M. Cutkosky A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime J R Soc Interface, December 6, 2009; 6(41): 1223 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. R. Bullock and W. Federle Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1876 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, S. Sponberg, A. Parness, N. Esparza, D. Soto, T. Yamaguchi, M. Broide, M. Cutkosky, C. Creton, et al. Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae J R Soc Interface, June 3, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0133v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Jeong, J.-K. Lee, H. N. Kim, S. H. Moon, and K. Y. Suh A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5639 - 5644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lee, C. Majidi, B. Schubert, and R. S Fearing Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2008; 5(25): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Schubert, J. Lee, C. Majidi, and R. S Fearing Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. II. Microscale behaviour J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2008; 5(25): 845 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Autumn and N. Gravish Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology Phil Trans R Soc A, May 13, 2008; 366(1870): 1575 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Gravish, M. Wilkinson, and K. Autumn Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment J R Soc Interface, March 6, 2008; 5(20): 339 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M Peattie, C. Majidi, A. Corder, and R. J Full Ancestrally high elastic modulus of gecko setal {beta}-keratin J R Soc Interface, December 22, 2007; 4(17): 1071 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Peattie and R. J. Full Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18595 - 18600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Autumn, A. Dittmore, D. Santos, M. Spenko, and M. Cutkosky Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3569 - 3579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]