QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 17, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3370-3382 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02392

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ahn, A. N. Articles by Full, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ahn, A. N. Articles by Full, R. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In situ muscle power differs without varying in vitro mechanical properties in two insect leg muscles innervated by the same motor neuron

A. N. Ahn^*, K. Meijer and R. J. Full

Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA

^* Author for correspondence at present address: Department of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Boulevard, Claremont, CA 91711, USA (e-mail: aahn{at}hmc.edu)

Accepted 18 June 2006

The mechanical behavior of muscle during locomotion is often predicted by its anatomy, kinematics, activation pattern and contractile properties. The neuromuscular design of the cockroach leg provides a model system to examine these assumptions, because a single motor neuron innervates two extensor muscles operating at a single joint. Comparisons of the in situ measurements under in vivo running conditions of muscle 178 to a previously examined muscle (179) demonstrate that the same inputs (e.g. neural signal and kinematics) can result in different mechanical outputs. The same neural signal and kinematics, as determined during running, can result in different mechanical functions, even when the two anatomically similar muscles possess the same contraction kinetics, force-velocity properties and tetanic force-length properties. Although active shortening greatly depressed force under in vivo-like strain and stimulation conditions, force depression was similarly proportional to strain, similarly inversely proportional to stimulation level, and similarly independent of initial length and shortening velocity between the two muscles. Lastly, passive pre-stretch enhanced force similarly between the two muscles. The forces generated by the two muscles when stimulated with their in vivo pattern at lengths equal to or shorter than rest length differed, however. Overall, differences between the two muscles in their submaximal force-length relationships can account for up to 75% of the difference between the two muscles in peak force generated at short lengths observed during oscillatory contractions. Despite the fact that these muscles act at the same joint, are stimulated by the same motor neuron with an identical pattern, and possess many of the same in vitro mechanical properties, the mechanical outputs of two leg extensor muscles can be vastly different.

Key words: muscle, work loop, motor control

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. A. Woods Jr, S. J. Fusillo, and B. A. Trimmer Dynamic properties of a locomotory muscle of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta during strain cycling and simulated natural crawling J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2008; 211(6): 873 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sponberg and R. J. Full Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 433 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 16 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]