|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 3, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3114-3130 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02363
Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering
Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: thedrick{at}u.washington.edu)
Accepted 5 June 2006
The inverse problem of hovering flight, that is, the range of wing movements appropriate for sustained flight at a fixed position and orientation, was examined by developing a simulation of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Inverse problems arise when one is seeking the parameters that are required to achieve a specified model outcome. In contrast, forward problems explore the outcomes given a specified set of input parameters. The simulation was coupled to a microgenetic algorithm that found specific sequences of wing and body motions, encoded by ten independent kinematic parameters, capable of generating the fixed body position and orientation characteristic of hovering flight. Additionally, we explored the consequences of restricting the number of free kinematic parameters and used this information to assess the importance to flight control of individual parameters and various combinations of them.
Output from the simulated moth was compared to kinematic recordings of hovering flight in real hawkmoths; the real and simulated moths performed similarly with respect to their range of variation in position and orientation. The simulated moth also used average wingbeat kinematics (amplitude, stroke plane orientation, etc) similar to those of the real moths. However, many different subsets of the available kinematic were sufficient for hovering flight and available kinematic data from real moths does not include sufficient detail to assess which, if any, of these was consistent with the real moth.
This general result, the multiplicity of possible hovering kinematics, shows that the means by which Manduca sexta actually maintains position and orientation may have considerable freedom and therefore may be influenced by many other factors beyond the physical and aerodynamic requirements of hovering flight.
Key words: inverse problem, insect flight control, biomechanics, Manduca sexta
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. H. Wu, Y. L. Zhang, and M. Sun Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3313 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Ristroph, G. J. Berman, A. J. Bergou, Z. J. Wang, and I. Cohen Automated hull reconstruction motion tracking (HRMT) applied to sideways maneuvers of free-flying insects J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2009; 212(9): 1324 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. W. Tanner, M. Regnier, and T. L. Daniel A spatially explicit model of muscle contraction explains a relationship between activation phase, power and ATP utilization in insect flight J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 180 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 16 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Phillips KEEPING MATH-MOTH ALOFT J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
