spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 3, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3114-3130 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02363
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedrick, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hedrick, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, T. L.

Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering

T. L. Hedrick* and T. L. Daniel

Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: thedrick{at}u.washington.edu)

Accepted 5 June 2006

The inverse problem of hovering flight, that is, the range of wing movements appropriate for sustained flight at a fixed position and orientation, was examined by developing a simulation of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Inverse problems arise when one is seeking the parameters that are required to achieve a specified model outcome. In contrast, forward problems explore the outcomes given a specified set of input parameters. The simulation was coupled to a microgenetic algorithm that found specific sequences of wing and body motions, encoded by ten independent kinematic parameters, capable of generating the fixed body position and orientation characteristic of hovering flight. Additionally, we explored the consequences of restricting the number of free kinematic parameters and used this information to assess the importance to flight control of individual parameters and various combinations of them.

Output from the simulated moth was compared to kinematic recordings of hovering flight in real hawkmoths; the real and simulated moths performed similarly with respect to their range of variation in position and orientation. The simulated moth also used average wingbeat kinematics (amplitude, stroke plane orientation, etc) similar to those of the real moths. However, many different subsets of the available kinematic were sufficient for hovering flight and available kinematic data from real moths does not include sufficient detail to assess which, if any, of these was consistent with the real moth.

This general result, the multiplicity of possible hovering kinematics, shows that the means by which Manduca sexta actually maintains position and orientation may have considerable freedom and therefore may be influenced by many other factors beyond the physical and aerodynamic requirements of hovering flight.

Key words: inverse problem, insect flight control, biomechanics, Manduca sexta


Related articles in JEB:

KEEPING MATH-MOTH ALOFT
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2006 209: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. C. W. Tanner, M. Regnier, and T. L. Daniel
A spatially explicit model of muscle contraction explains a relationship between activation phase, power and ATP utilization in insect flight
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 180 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al.
Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 16 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Phillips
KEEPING MATH-MOTH ALOFT
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006