|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online July 20, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3025-3042 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02304
The influence of collagen fiber orientation and other histocompositional characteristics on the mechanical properties of equine cortical bone
1 Utah Bone and Joint Center, 5323 S. Woodrow Street #202, Salt Lake City,
UT 84107, USA
2 Bone and Joint Research Laboratories, Deparment of Veteran's Affairs
Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3 Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center,
Aurora, CO, USA
4 Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT,
USA
* Author for correspondence at address 1 (e-mail: jskedros{at}utahboneandjoint.com)
Accepted 27 April 2006
This study examined relative influences of predominant collagen fiber orientation (CFO), mineralization (% ash), and other microstructural characteristics on the mechanical properties of equine cortical bone. Using strain-mode-specific (S-M-S) testing (compression testing of bone habitually loaded in compression; tension testing of bone habitually loaded in tension), the relative mechanical importance of CFO and other material characteristics were examined in equine third metacarpals (MC3s). This model was chosen since it had a consistent non-uniform strain distribution estimated by finite element analysis (FEA) near mid-diaphysis of a thoroughbred horse, net tension in the dorsal/lateral cortices and net compression in the palmar/medial cortices. Bone specimens from regions habitually loaded in tension or compression were: (1) tested to failure in both axial compression and tension in order to contrast S-M-S vs non-S-M-S behavior, and (2) analyzed for CFO, % ash, porosity, fractional area of secondary osteonal bone, osteon cross-sectional area, and population densities of secondary osteons and osteocyte lacunae. Multivariate multiple regression analyses revealed that in S-M-S compression testing, CFO most strongly influenced total energy (pre-yield elastic energy plus post-yield plastic energy); in S-M-S tension testing CFO most strongly influenced post-yield energy and total energy. CFO was less important in explaining S-M-S elastic modulus, and yield and ultimate stress. Therefore, in S-M-S loading CFO appears to be important in influencing energy absorption, whereas the other characteristics have a more dominant influence in elastic modulus, pre-yield behavior and strength. These data generally support the hypothesis that differentially affecting S-M-S energy absorption may be an important consequence of regional histocompositional heterogeneity in the equine MC3. Data inconsistent with the hypothesis, including the lack of highly longitudinal collagen in the dorsal-lateral `tension' region, paradoxical histologic organization in some locations, and lack of significantly improved S-M-S properties in some locations, might reflect the absence of a similar habitual strain distribution in all bones. An alternative strain distribution based on in vivo strain measurements, without FEA, on non-Thoroughbreds showing net compression along the dorsal-palmar axis might be more characteristic of the habitual loading of some of the bones that we examined. In turn, some inconsistencies might also reflect the complex torsion/bending loading regime that the MC3 sustains when the animal undergoes a variety of gaits and activities, which may be representative of only a portion of our animals, again reflecting the possibility that not all of the bones examined had similar habitual loading histories.
Key words: collagen fiber orientation, osteon, equine third metacarpal, cortical bone, bone mechanical properties
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Moreno, R. P. Main, and A. A. Biewener Variability in forelimb bone strains during non-steady locomotor activities in goats J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1148 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||